121–130 of 150 posts
I find this fascinating, as it really speaks to my experience in small companies. The thing you actually create -- code, docs, self-serve product, sales and marketing collateral -- isn't particularly valuable. Most of the knowledge is tribal knowledge, and you're all just spending time trying to expand that. It's amazing how far you can go, and have to go, with the informational equivalent of duct tape and string.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
$1500/1920 work hours a year = $0.78/hr. Seems reasonable to me.
Maybe. $1600 is still $1600 though, and the luxuries add up to real money. Especially worrisome when you're generating no real revenue and operating on other people's dime.
Looks like I'm getting a new chair soon. The best thing about the Dot Com bubble bursting was my cheap Aeron. I'm ready to upgrade.
Looks like I'm getting a new chair soon. The best thing about the Dot Com bubble bursting was my cheap Aeron. I'm ready to upgrade.
Looks like I'm getting a new chair soon. The best thing about the Dot Com bubble bursting was my cheap Aeron. I'm ready to upgrade.
Probably sounds bizarre, but when I was setting up my home office, I didn't really have time to go out and look for chairs. I decided just to use a $10 stool until I could find a chair that I really liked. 2 years later, I love the stool :-) I have to think about posture, but I'm convinced that the complete lack of support has helped strengthen my core. I don't really want to go back to a normal chair.
Here's him making the same exact kinds of claims in 2011. He called himself (or claimed that people called him) the 'undertaker' back then: https://www.pehub.com/2011/08/silicon-valley%E2%80%99s-under...
Here's an idea. Go talk to these guys when you're starting your company. These guys are seeing all the failures, so they should have a decent grasp of what NOT to do. Discounting for the fact that they're only seeing failures.
The whole idea of creating a large valuation so that you can have a successful exit is literally just that. You are creating demand for the company so that you can sell it to somebody and keep part of the money. The idea of starting a company so that you share in part of the profit generated by the company is ludicrous in today's world.
But always keep in mind that being "successful" is not the only way to move money from an investor's pocket into your own. You can merely hype the hell out of the company. If successful, you can engineer an exit with no viable product. You can also create the "killer demo" which encourages a large company to buy you just so that they can suppress the technology (not so common in this decade, but was standard practice in the 2000's).
And here's the best part. If you "fail" utterly, you can still pocket a fair amount of cash. Most successful entrepreneurs that I worked with do not have the attitude that "this company must succeed". Not by a long shot. They throw spaghetti up against the wall over and over and over again, with the belief that eventually something will stick. They view the "failures" as the salary they get paid (from investors) while waiting for the money train to roll in to town.
What's even more awesome (as in, it strikes me with awe) is that if you manage to hype your way into the second round (or higher) consistently, then you are a high flyer and people will flock to stuff money into your pockets, even though you have never actually produced a "successful" venture.
I am absolutely convinced that your job as a founder is not to make the company "successful". Your job is to raise money, make connections and sell the company. Sure success is a "nice to have", but leave that to your CTO/COO/unwitting co-founder. I often see founders on HN complaining of burnout, trying to keep it all together. Meanwhile all of the successful founders I've worked with don't get bogged down with that stuff. Their the ones going home at 4:30 while the hired help stays until 2 in the morning propping up the server with popsicle sticks and devising various sacrifices to appease whatever god seems to be angry at the time.
Typed partially in jest... only partially...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe. $1600 is still $1600 though, and the luxuries add up to real money. Especially worrisome when you're generating no real revenue and operating on other people's dime.
Is your workstation a luxury? Bathrooms? Desks? Ergonomic chairs are no different. They are tools of your trade; don't skimp on tools.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's some innocence in your comment which I wish I still appreciated. I think the grittier reality is that a lot of these startups were based on generally mediocre ideas, but were funded anyway because of relationships and contacts. I cringe every time I see another "Come help us change the world at..." or "Come help us reinvent blah blah" here on HN. Instant red flag to me, but I'll be damned if they didn't get f…
I really wish I remember where I had heard it or maybe read it, but it was an investor's advice to new investors: "If the (startup) company comes in to the (investor) meeting with lots of color and excitement, turn him down. The guy that comes in and nearly bores you to sleep with his spreadsheets, he's the one to invest in."