Launch HN: Boxouse (YC W17) – Shipping-container homes
51–60 of 156 posts
Re: Launch HN: Boxouse (YC W17) – Shipping-container homes
#52These prices seem too high. Low-end mobile homes are around the same price, are larger, offer nicer interiors, and face fewer legal complexities. I also know tiny home builders who can custom build homes with similar square footage as these for around the same price. I live in Missouri so housing is cheap, but isn't the advantage of pre-fab homes the ability to ship them for a much lower cost than building on-site? I…
Re: Launch HN: Boxouse (YC W17) – Shipping-container homes
#53Not trying to be a hater. I understand what is pictured may be prototypes.. if they are you shouldn't be showing them unless you have that caveat in the picture. Both the design is poor, and the craftsmanship is low. If this is past the prototype stage, and this is what you will actually be selling. Then you really don't understand the pre-fab space nor the price points of the pre-fab space.
Re: Launch HN: Boxouse (YC W17) – Shipping-container homes
#54Does Boxhouse handle acquiring potable water and sanitary sewer on behalf of the owner?
Re: Launch HN: Boxouse (YC W17) – Shipping-container homes
#55I was under the impression zoning regulation, not construction costs, was the main challenge for development in urban areas. Can you seriously just drop these off in people's backyards and legally rent them out?
Also at the local level are things like occupational taxes and building permits. Unlike room and whole house rental, a container provides direct visible evidence of the activity from the air, over a neighbor's fence, or sometimes from the street.
Re: Launch HN: Boxouse (YC W17) – Shipping-container homes
#56Does Boxhouse handle acquiring potable water and sanitary sewer on behalf of the owner?
Yes. Depending on the location and length of time the boxouse will be there, we can do off-grid (tanks monitored and filled/pumped as need, RV-style) or grid-connected (linked to existing house's plumbing)
Re: Launch HN: Boxouse (YC W17) – Shipping-container homes
#57Hi Luke! What is your initial market, and what are your scaling plans?
Re: Launch HN: Boxouse (YC W17) – Shipping-container homes
#58Hi Luke! What is your initial market, and what are your scaling plans?
Hi Andrew! Initial focus is the Bay Area, where rents are particularly absurd. Unlike other tiny homes, we can stack these to scale existing locations to meet demand (with some zoning hurdles, of course)
Re: Launch HN: Boxouse (YC W17) – Shipping-container homes
#59I've been in shipping container buildings before (e.g. Frietag store in Zurich) - they are not really a great size. Many Mobile homes that are comfortable feature pop-out sides. Any plans for expanding them?
Some real positives - fireproof envelope, Envelope can be welded to, several formats available - including ones with side doors can be "racked" can be made airtight (allows you to specify air exchanges, rather than estimate them) portability with the right equipment.
Re: Launch HN: Boxouse (YC W17) – Shipping-container homes
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. Depending on the location and length of time the boxouse will be there, we can do off-grid (tanks monitored and filled/pumped as need, RV-style) or grid-connected (linked to existing house's plumbing)
Does Boxhouse absorb the costs of permitting and construction for homeowners? What sort of duration is necessary?