How police found Twitter user accused of sending seizure-triggering GIF
1–10 of 148 posts
Re: How police found Twitter user accused of sending seizure-triggering GIF
#2Re: How police found Twitter user accused of sending seizure-triggering GIF
#3Re: How police found Twitter user accused of sending seizure-triggering GIF
#4Twitter gave the police information about the phone number which registered the account that sent the seizure-triggering gif
AT&T gave the police information that is was a Tracfone prepaid account with an associated toll record that was an iphone
Apple gave them access to his cloud account which had all the incriminating details needed including email / picture of him with his drivers license and data about the victim
Re: How police found Twitter user accused of sending seizure-triggering GIF
#5Re: How police found Twitter user accused of sending seizure-triggering GIF
#6That seems like a very reasonable process. Nothing unusual anyways.
Can anyone point out what might be of interest here.
Re: How police found Twitter user accused of sending seizure-triggering GIF
#7That seems like a very reasonable process. Nothing unusual anyways.
Agreed. This appears to be the ordinary process. Can anyone point out what might be of interest here.
Re: How police found Twitter user accused of sending seizure-triggering GIF
#8> "AT&T responded and a review of the subscriber information showed the telephone number was associated with a Tracfone prepaid account with no subscriber information. However, a review of the AT&T toll records showed an associated Apple iPhone 6A Model 1586"
That is, if you are a Tracfone user and Tracfone uses AT&T to provide service, AT&T effectively sees the Tracfone user information?
Also, Twitter tracks the type of client used to send a tweet and reveals it in the metadata accessible to the public API -- the `source` attribute [0], e.g. "Twitter for iPhone", "Twitter Web Client", "TweetDeck". And Twitter probably captures more about the device/client that isn't publicly revealed, such as the browser agent for when a tweet is sent via the web client.
If the suspect had tweeted using the iPhone client, or via the iPhone Safari browser, would the police have enough info to subpoena Apple for Apple Account tied to that specific phone number? In other words, skipping the process of subpoenaing AT&T/Tracfone because the suspect was dumb enough to register the Twitter account using that phone number?
[0] https://dev.twitter.com/rest/reference/post/statuses/update
Re: How police found Twitter user accused of sending seizure-triggering GIF
#9Desktop browsers allow you to disable auto-playing animated images. I'm surprised mobile browsers don't seem to have this. If I suffered from this, I'd want some sort of reasonable protection from asshats.
One would have thought this scenario would have been thought of.
Is it possible on iOS to disable animations / autoplay within an app?
Re: How police found Twitter user accused of sending seizure-triggering GIF
#10That seems like a very reasonable process. Nothing unusual anyways.
Agreed. This appears to be the ordinary process. Can anyone point out what might be of interest here.