Library of Congress holds conference on origins of portolan charts
11–13 of 13 posts
Re: Library of Congress holds conference on origins of portolan charts
#12The article speculates about Roman or Phoenician maps that might have been lost, but makes no mention of the more probable Arab influence. This is just my naive guess, but wasn't Arab mathematics and astronomy the state-of-the-art of the time and also probably Arabs had the most detailed information about the mediteranean region at that time.
But I believe these maps were created through dead reckoning. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_reckoning William Clark created a meticulously detailed highly accurate map of the Missouri, Snake, and Columbia rivers through dead reckoning, with the aid only of compass and sextant for latitude. (Lewis & Clark made some detailed observations for longitude, but the calculations were not performed until after the expedition was over and had nothing to do with Clark's map.)
I'll bet these maps originally had nothing to do with normal navigation (i.e. for commerce) accurate maps were for a long time military intelligence assets.
Great Britain employed a network of spies employing dead reckoning techniques to map out areas of south central Asia the British did not have access to (for military/intelligence purposes). Rudyard Kipling's novel Kim deals with this historical episode.
Re: Library of Congress holds conference on origins of portolan charts
#13I don't know about the rest of HN, but I had no clue what a Portolan Chart was until I read this article. My re-titling was intentional and I would imagine helped get the article to the front page.
Stop meddling or I am going to stop contributing. I understand there are times when a title is misleading or goes against guidelines, but this change is just a mod on a power trip.