Live data from Hacker News

Library of Congress holds conference on origins of portolan charts

washingtonpost.com

11–13 of 13 posts

Re: Library of Congress holds conference on origins of portolan charts

#12
post #3

The article speculates about Roman or Phoenician maps that might have been lost, but makes no mention of the more probable Arab influence. This is just my naive guess, but wasn't Arab mathematics and astronomy the state-of-the-art of the time and also probably Arabs had the most detailed information about the mediteranean region at that time.

The Arabs at the time had preserved a good portion of the scientific researches of the Ptolemaic Greeks, who were able to determine latitude (and I think longitude somewhat with many astronomical observations over time), so the relative locations of some key ports may have filtered out to some European cartographers at the time. The ability to observe latitude was possibly seeing limited re-discovery in Europe through Arab sources. For sure by the early 15th century Portuguese navigators could easily observe latitude.

But I believe these maps were created through dead reckoning. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_reckoning William Clark created a meticulously detailed highly accurate map of the Missouri, Snake, and Columbia rivers through dead reckoning, with the aid only of compass and sextant for latitude. (Lewis & Clark made some detailed observations for longitude, but the calculations were not performed until after the expedition was over and had nothing to do with Clark's map.)

I'll bet these maps originally had nothing to do with normal navigation (i.e. for commerce) accurate maps were for a long time military intelligence assets.

Great Britain employed a network of spies employing dead reckoning techniques to map out areas of south central Asia the British did not have access to (for military/intelligence purposes). Rudyard Kipling's novel Kim deals with this historical episode.

Re: Library of Congress holds conference on origins of portolan charts

#13
My title was originally "Accurate map from 1275." Thankfully, some truly meddlesome mod took all meaning from the title and instead used the hackneyed print headline that was no doubt written to fill a certain space in a broadsheet.

I don't know about the rest of HN, but I had no clue what a Portolan Chart was until I read this article. My re-titling was intentional and I would imagine helped get the article to the front page.

Stop meddling or I am going to stop contributing. I understand there are times when a title is misleading or goes against guidelines, but this change is just a mod on a power trip.

Post reply on HN