Live data from Hacker News

Why are the east of cities usually poorer?

thejanuarist.com

11–20 of 101 posts

Re: Why are the east of cities usually poorer?

#11

Actually in most of the major US cities, the south side is bad. For example, SE DC, south side Chicago, south-central LA

I don't know about DC and LA(though I wonder if both have developed recently enough that the effect would be negated) but in Chicago the souh side is the furthest east (due to lake michigan) and the suburbs to the east of the city aren't exactly wealthy either.

Re: Why are the east of cities usually poorer?

#13

Actually in most of the major US cities, the south side is bad. For example, SE DC, south side Chicago, south-central LA

There's an interesting discussion (and some suggestions) about the North/South divide here: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1126279

Re: Why are the east of cities usually poorer?

#15
post #3

In Australia, where the prevailing winds are also westerlies, the opposite is true. i.e. the east of most cities is more prestigious than the west.

Except in WA, where many prestigious suburbs are in the West (Peppermint Grove, etc), and Adelaide where they are distributed around the center (North Adelaide to the North, Unley Park & Springfield to the South, as well as some in the East).

I think that in Australian cities factors other than wind direction have a larger influence.

Re: Why are the east of cities usually poorer?

#18
post #13

Actually in most of the major US cities, the south side is bad. For example, SE DC, south side Chicago, south-central LA

There's an interesting discussion (and some suggestions) about the North/South divide here: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1126279

My guess is that it's just a coincidence. The south side of Chicago is not intrinsically undesirable. There is a lot of open space, there is good public transportation, and there are a lot of beautiful historical buildings. There just happens to be a lot of crime, which pushes the affluent out, who have enough money to not have to deal with that problem. (Of course, there is Chinatown, Bridgeport, and Hyde Park, which are generally fine neighborhoods. The President of the United States lives on the South Side...)

Re: Why are the east of cities usually poorer?

#20
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Out of interest, is that typical on both coasts? Just wondering if the river direction has anything to do with it.

I don't know about Perth, but it's definitely true in Sydney (Ocean on the east) and Melbourne (Ocean on the south).

Access to the surf is definitely a big factor in Oz cities. Also many of the cities started as coastal settlements, so the older parts of the city tend to be closest to the coast (and they tend to be the richer bits??).

In Brisbane much of the east of the city is taken up by port and airport, so not such a desirable area.

Post reply on HN