Is the motivation to use a hackintosh over linux apps you cant get for Linux mainly?
Building a Hackintosh Pro
231–240 of 272 posts
Re: Building a Hackintosh Pro
#232Re: Building a Hackintosh Pro
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because they are a computer company. Their inability to make a top of the line desktop is threatening my ability to justify buying their laptops or anything else from them. I run a company. I'm not going to mix and match operating systems and if I can't have high end desktops for heavy media work I'm going to switch everything eventually. I'm not abnormal. People keep trying to come up with some 4D chess explanations…
>Because they are a computer company. You saying this doesn't make it true. To a neutral observer, Apple looks like a technology company that makes consumer products, including sometimes computers.
Re: Building a Hackintosh Pro
#234>> Maybe Apple have been waiting for the recently released Ryzen CPUs from AMD? You can't even run the stock kernel on AMD chips. How much QA and other work Apple would have to do, I have no idea.
I honestly dont think any consumer will stop buying Mac just because Intel isn't inside the Mac. And it will save Apple at least $200 BOM per Mac, making final Mac Selling price around ~$250 less. Slightly more affordable. Or more likely, staying within the same pricing and give you double the SSD storage.
Re: Building a Hackintosh Pro
#235Earlier quoted context omitted.
Great - many thanks - this is very helpful. "Next was a NVIDIA GTX 970 card" How many PCI slots does that card take up ? I currently drive four monitors with my mac pro and the single slot aspect of the gt120s makes that easy ... "All in all this is the best Mac I've ever owned and it amazes me it works as well as it does being almost 8 years old now." I know, right ? I regularly have 20+ chrome tabs open along with…
> My only issue is that I have only ever run snow leopard on it and now chrome no longer has updates, so I need to move to ... mavericks maybe ? I feel like mavericks is the most stable/sane OSX release since SL ... This will obviously depend on the hardware/software you use but Mavericks was the buggiest and worst OS X release on my rMBP. I was rebooting weekly due to weird graphics drivers glitches and inexplicable…
http://tidbits.com/article/16966
EDIT: 10.12.3 doesn’t seem to be much better, sadly:
Re: Building a Hackintosh Pro
#236Earlier quoted context omitted.
I buy an original mac because I want a machine that does what it does without all the overhead of assembling it myself. if i spend just 2 hours of my time assembling something equal for 400 bucks less, ive gained nothing. and chances are itll take a lot longer than those 2 hours. with a mac, you click a button and receive a machine that is "pretty fuckin good", for 1700-2500 dollars. do I know I could do better? Sure…
"i could almost turn "could macs be good value?" into a mandatory interview question, because those who say no don't understand how trading money for time works. working with such fools is incredibly tedious and painful." I would advise against that, unless you are in the habit of interviewing people who value their time at $200+ per hour, such as in your above example. Otherwise, their answer may be coming from a sl…
Re: Building a Hackintosh Pro
#237Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah. I buy Macs because they "just work", so a Hackintosh completely destroys the point of even owning a Mac for me.
I always felt the same way. Even a huge cost premium matters very little to me since it's a machine I use professionally. However I'm starting to give it serious consideration as Apple is signaling pretty hard that they don't give a shit about desktops any more, and MacOS is not seeing much development other than some sloppy seconds and half baked ports of iOS ideas. I'm pretty heavily depend on MacOS for my daily wo…
While I may not wholly disagree with this, what OS is doing much better? Linux is still slowly catching up to the macOS graphics compositor from 10 years ago, and Microsoft is busy integrating its own half-baked port of Windows Tablet Edition... True Windows does have some momentum with the new ubuntu subsystem, but that's still catching up when macOS is a real native UNIX from the ground up.
There's not much more I want out of my OS... a new filesystem to replace the 30-year-old-design HFS+ is already on the way, and while I'd love a more modern CLI userland, that isn't going to happen due to legal reasons, so I'm fine with homebrew. They just need to fix SMB and clean up bugs and performance issues for me to be totally happy.
Re: Building a Hackintosh Pro
#238Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh man, I just saw DOOM on a DS the other day. Was it a source-port or a dosbox implementation?
Source port using SDL and my friend Wintermute's libnds. There's no way the DS's ARM9 processor would've been able to handle running DOSBOX. Just out of curiosity, where did you see it, if you don't mind me asking? Man, I remember feeling disappointed people weren't making more FPS games for DS, so I decided DOOM would be fun to port. I even got the wifi multiplayer working. EDIT: The biggest unsolved hurdle was gett…
Re: Building a Hackintosh Pro
#239Earlier quoted context omitted.
Depends on the device and the ROM creator. I'm using an OnePlus One with SultanXDA's excellent CyanongenMod-based ROM for over a year. Updated every month with security updates and works perfectly fine. Similar good experience with Nexus 4 and NitrogenOS for my standby device. Android 7, works perfectly fine.
Wow, "security updates" from some random person making roms on the internet. Good luck buddy!
Re: Building a Hackintosh Pro
#240While this PC looks great, visually, and spec wise; isn't this missing the point? It seems like a company needs to build a _very_ good linux distro with design first principles. It needs to work on a number of devices. More importantly, it needs to be a paid OS. It can have an open source distro underneath, but the UI needs to be created by people who are paid well.
This is pretty much what the elementary folks are trying to do https://elementary.io/
It seems to me there is a disconnect between developers and designers. When I ask devs why there isn't a nice looking Linux distro, they ask me why I care about what the UI looks like. Designers don't use or care about Linux because of the lack of decent design software. As much as I love the concept of GIMP, it is not a realistic alternative to Adobe software (especially things like InDesign and XD) or Sketch, for example.
As a designer-developer, Linux is still not an easy choice for me, as much as I'd like it to be. elementaryOS is a nice start, but I still end up using macOS if given the choice.