Ask HN: Best books on AI?
1–10 of 95 posts
Re: Ask HN: Best books on AI?
#2The first chapter in the book provides a detailed analysis of how other disciplines contribute to the idea of AI - from Philosophy to Psychology, Biology to Computer Science. Makes for an interesting read, even for a non-tech reader.
Re: Ask HN: Best books on AI?
#3Though it is an academic book, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach by Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig. The first chapter in the book provides a detailed analysis of how other disciplines contribute to the idea of AI - from Philosophy to Psychology, Biology to Computer Science. Makes for an interesting read, even for a non-tech reader.
If you're also looking for a course that goes alongside the book, I highly recommend UC Berkley's CS188 (you can find it at http://ai.berkeley.edu).
The lecturer Pieter Abbeel does such a good job explaining stuff and the programming exercises are really neat.
Edit: Formatting
Re: Ask HN: Best books on AI?
#4Though it is an academic book, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach by Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig. The first chapter in the book provides a detailed analysis of how other disciplines contribute to the idea of AI - from Philosophy to Psychology, Biology to Computer Science. Makes for an interesting read, even for a non-tech reader.
Re: Ask HN: Best books on AI?
#5Re: Ask HN: Best books on AI?
#6This is a good getting started book for TensorFlow:
https://www.amazon.com/TensorFlow-Machine-Learning-Cookbook-...
Re: Ask HN: Best books on AI?
#7One of the best books on AI and Programming ever.
Re: Ask HN: Best books on AI?
#8Re: Ask HN: Best books on AI?
#9AI is not a field where the practitioners can safely ignore the academic. A huge number of people got into rabbit-holes in its history and basically failed completely and wasted decades of their lives, in some cases.
Re: Ask HN: Best books on AI?
#10AI is not a field where the practitioners can safely ignore the academic. A huge number of people got into rabbit-holes in its history and basically failed completely and wasted decades of their lives, in some cases.
Anecdotal. Do you have specific records of such failures?
Cycorp still exists, from 1984. However, D. Lenat's approach to AI by ontology engineering has basically been completely infertile after about the early 90's.
Feigenbaum's expert systems stuff was a basic bust, it led to the Japanese just throwing that stuff away. People spent an incredible amount of effort and time systematizing expert knowledge and making expert systems and it was not a happy time. Much of that knowledge went into probabilistic forms, culminating in the Bayes net. The most famous application of Bayes net: Clippy (there are a lot more successful applications, but still...)
It was believed shortly after the AI conference that computer vision could be solved by a summer project in the 50's. That didn't happen.