Live data from Hacker News

Primer (film)

en.wikipedia.org

21–30 of 93 posts

Re: Primer (film)

#21
post #3

Alas, most of people saw Avatar, and believe that it was the best movie in the history of genre..

I haven't seen Avatar yet. I'm likely one of the 7 who hasn't.

It was totally worth seeing in 3D and on big screen just for the effects. Story's lame though.

Re: Primer (film)

#22
Set time aside to watch it twice. It's only 77 minutes long, and I believe that's a plus. I saw this for the first time with a few friends and when it was over, nobody protested when I started it over immediately.

I've watched this movie several times and I pick up on new things almost every time.

Re: Primer (film)

#23

Please, don't read the Wikipedia article before you go out and rent or buy this movie. The movie is absolutely fantastic. I have seen it 17 to 18 times, and even-though people have attempted to explain everything that is going on to me I still have a hard time wrapping my mind around it. Awesome for the hacker in you!

Exactly. I'm surprised this link got upvoted this much. Everyone should have already seen this movie ;)

Re: Primer (film)

#25
The funniest thing is that people have actually tried to graph all the different timelines. Some examples:

  * http://i.imgur.com/kqja1.jpg
  * http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/PrimerTimeline.gif

Re: Primer (film)

#26
post #15

Yeah a great flick. Only cost $7k dollars to make or something. Needs to be watched MANY times to figure it out, but the great thing is it seems to all hold together.

The DVD commentary is incredibly interesting because of this - mostly explaining how they kept the cost so low

Re: Primer (film)

#27

Please, don't read the Wikipedia article before you go out and rent or buy this movie. The movie is absolutely fantastic. I have seen it 17 to 18 times, and even-though people have attempted to explain everything that is going on to me I still have a hard time wrapping my mind around it. Awesome for the hacker in you!

I'm ashamed to say I haven't seen this movie yet, I must order the DVD this weekend, (now that I've been reminded for the umpteenth time).

On a side note, my biggest annoyance with Wikipedia is manifest in articles about movies. For some reason, they allow an editorial policy of essentially writing out a scene by scene account of a movie.

Re: Primer (film)

#28
I watched this movie several years ago, and thinking about it still messes with my brain. Even though I wouldn't watch it again, I still recommend you go and see it if you haven't already!

Re: Primer (film)

#29
post #9
post #8

If you like films like Primer you will like Triangle. I clearly want to watch it again to understand every time loop. Plus there's Melissa George in the lead role, which doesn't hurt. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1187064/ If you're broke, it's available on Bittorrent (I am broke). Otherwise you won't regret your purchase.

Triangle was ok, but it has another feel to the movie. It's a bit of a horror with some mystical explanation to it. But Primer is pure mind-bending sci-fi. You could feel the atmosphere of the guys inventing something like few other movies. Actually - this is how I think a startup should feel and look like: the way the movie portrays it at the beginning, while the guys are still figuring things out.

Agreed. TRIANGLE was a pleasant surprise --far better than the average for that genre-- but not 'hard' sci-fi.

Another surprisingly good lower-budget/-attention sci-fi film is PANDORUM.

Re: Primer (film)

#30

Please, don't read the Wikipedia article before you go out and rent or buy this movie. The movie is absolutely fantastic. I have seen it 17 to 18 times, and even-though people have attempted to explain everything that is going on to me I still have a hard time wrapping my mind around it. Awesome for the hacker in you!

I'm ashamed to say I haven't seen this movie yet, I must order the DVD this weekend, (now that I've been reminded for the umpteenth time). On a side note, my biggest annoyance with Wikipedia is manifest in articles about movies. For some reason, they allow an editorial policy of essentially writing out a scene by scene account of a movie.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN