Live data from Hacker News

Pi-hole – A black hole for Internet advertisements

pi-hole.net

31–40 of 320 posts

Re: Pi-hole – A black hole for Internet advertisements

#31

I just set this up at home yesterday (using an Odroid C2). A very pleasant experience so far. I'm trying to find other services that are worth running in a similar fashion. Any ideas?

Not strictly useful for yourself, but you could run a tor relay https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-doc-relay.html.en

That is a decent idea.

I have never used Tor though, and I can't say I know the consequences of running a relay. So I'd probably skip that.

Re: Pi-hole – A black hole for Internet advertisements

#32

The installation shortcut given is curl -sSL https://install.pi-hole.net | bash and one is expected to execute this as root. Yes, I know this is supposed to be a convenience thing, but I wish people wouldn't actively encourage this pattern.

https://www.idontplaydarts.com/2016/04/detecting-curl-pipe-b...

Re: Pi-hole – A black hole for Internet advertisements

#33

With all the ad blocking technologies that are coming up, I wonder if Google is devising something to counteract these efforts. For instance, since browser-based ad blockers work from what I know by blocking known domain names, couldn't Google create random subdomains and serve the code from a different subdomain every day or even every few hours, as well as change the way their JavaScript and HTML looks? Even someth…

Since all the popular filter lists are public, you could even scan them on the fly to evaluate your likelihood of being blocked.

But in the end you probably won't win against someone who really hates ads. - and that's probably better for users as well as advertisers.

Re: Pi-hole – A black hole for Internet advertisements

#34

The installation shortcut given is curl -sSL https://install.pi-hole.net | bash and one is expected to execute this as root. Yes, I know this is supposed to be a convenience thing, but I wish people wouldn't actively encourage this pattern.

I do not really see the problem. You have to trust them anyway to run code as root on your computer and the connection is encrypted.

Re: Pi-hole – A black hole for Internet advertisements

#36
post #29

How are people dealing with whitelisting when a website becomes broken because of an over zealous block. I find myself turning off ublock for some websites at least once a day, not because there are ads on the page but because they're issuing a dependency somewhere that has been blacklisted.

Through the admin console, you can whitelist domains or disable all blocking for a given amount of time.

Re: Pi-hole – A black hole for Internet advertisements

#38

With all the ad blocking technologies that are coming up, I wonder if Google is devising something to counteract these efforts. For instance, since browser-based ad blockers work from what I know by blocking known domain names, couldn't Google create random subdomains and serve the code from a different subdomain every day or even every few hours, as well as change the way their JavaScript and HTML looks? Even someth…

You would just block *.addomain.com at that point. Which is already what is being done on many of the blockers. There will always be domains to block, even if they add new domains, the blockers will probably be able to block them just as fast.

Re: Pi-hole – A black hole for Internet advertisements

#39

PiHole is pretty cool, very 'plug n play' which I like. A sufficiently advanced average user can set it up without too much trouble just following on a guide, even a relatively tech savvy 'lay' person can do this. If you like a more technical solution I prefer something like running a Unbound + NSD server Here's some great tutorials on that: (Kudos to the people who write Calomel, i really liked these tutorials, it w…

Check: https://www.pcengines.ch/

Maybe you can get some alternatives based on those cards.

Re: Pi-hole – A black hole for Internet advertisements

#40

The installation shortcut given is curl -sSL https://install.pi-hole.net | bash and one is expected to execute this as root. Yes, I know this is supposed to be a convenience thing, but I wish people wouldn't actively encourage this pattern.

I do not really see the problem. You have to trust them anyway to run code as root on your computer and the connection is encrypted.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN