Live data from Hacker News

How the Instant Pot cooker developed a cult following

bbc.co.uk

291–300 of 311 posts

Re: How the Instant Pot cooker developed a cult following

#291

Have had one since Black Friday. I feel generally competent in the kitchen to the point where assembling a nice meal (dare I say gourmet?) from scratch without a recipe is relatively easy for me. That said, I've found the Instant Pot to have a steep learning curve. For starters, you can't easily check on the food while it cooks, so if you are experimenting with large batch sizes and timing you are kind of gambling an…

I'm surprised at your experience, as mine has been the opposite. I use my pressure cooker as for probably 80% of my meals at home (not always for the main dish). I've never had a sub-par experience. I find the pressure cooker is the better bet for soups, anything bean-related, most things with chicken, ribs, hard-boiled eggs, and vegetable medleys.

You are right that the timing involved on many sites is misleading, yet I find that without fail the "active time" when using the pressure cooker is WAY lower while the total time is roughly the same or slightly shorter than a normal recipe (much shorter if making something with beans). That's the big win for me.

You can experiment all you want, but I don't. I just take recipes from others and use them, with some adaptation. There's a lot of resources, and most people have already workshopped anything I'm interesting in making.

Re: How the Instant Pot cooker developed a cult following

#292

Earlier quoted context omitted.

30 seconds? My machine takes 30 minutes just to heat up. I bought my grinder (Baratza Vario) and machine (an E61 based heat exchanger) in 2012 and they are getting to the end of life. I'm seriously thinking about switching to a Nespresso setup because it's way more convenient and the coffee is still pretty good. We have a k-cup machine at work and it's drinkable, but not great.

I'm not sure I'd group the Nespresso and Keurigs together. I've never had a good k-cup coffee but the Nespresso produces great cappuccinos and cafe au laits in about a minute. There's a dramatic difference in flavor between their different roasts though, I'm partial to the capriccio and voluto blends.

>I'm not sure I'd group the Nespresso and Keurigs together.

We have both in our workplace kitchen; they both produce mediocre coffee, in my opinion (and I'm no coffee snob). I wonder how the Nespresso got such a reputation? Is it widely considered good?

Re: How the Instant Pot cooker developed a cult following

#293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My wife has made hard boiled eggs, risotto (kinda) and yogurt in it. Didn't expect any of those. It advertised yogurt, but I didn't expect it to turn out as well as it did.

What's the benefit over boiling some eggs?

Much, much easier to peel.

Re: How the Instant Pot cooker developed a cult following

#294
post #72
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I find some basic knife skills to be a huge labor saver. I've had the same decent (ie, not serrated) $25 chef's knife for decades and can plow through basic veg prep in a few minutes. I don't like all the extra gadgets except a peeler. When I factor in setting up and washing some chopping or slicing machine, I'm way faster with just a knife and board. Two things to wash. And the board is also used to hold stuff on it…

Food processors (proper ones, not hand "choppers" and the like - those are nearly pointless) are a terrible replacement for basic knife skills. What they are mostly great at is a few things that are so labor intensive (ever made hummus by hand?) you otherwise might not bother. Also a good time saver for things like pasta dough.

Good for homemade bread.

Re: How the Instant Pot cooker developed a cult following

#295
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You'd use a regular pressure cooker for things like cooking a roast or chili in 45 minutes instead of 4 hours.

You can do that in a canner too. A canner can function as a pressure cooker, but a pressure cooker can't function as a canner.

For one thing, I don't see any electric pressure canners, only stovetop models.

Re: How the Instant Pot cooker developed a cult following

#296
post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't just mention how it makes great oatmeal without providing us the recipe! Please?

Courtesy of my dad. This is good stuff, and makes 4 servings. 1 cup steel cut oats 4 cups water 1/2 teaspoon salt Cook in Instapot, 5 min at 'Manual' pressure Let cool in Instapot for 20 minutes or until pressure relief button pops (if you don't let it depressurize slowly it will foam up inside and mess the lid) Add the following: 2 Tablespoons of chunky peanut butter (heaping) 2-3 heaping tablespoons of sugar (brown…

    1 cup steel cut oats
    4 cups water
That's as far as I get, I then cook it on the hob with a timer (7 minutes when cooking a single portion). I might occasionally add some sugar.

Clearly you and many other people are getting some benefit from the device, I'm really doubtful that I would.

Re: How the Instant Pot cooker developed a cult following

#297

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Generally, yes. Maybe I'm confused. Are you talking about the Instant Pot story, or the ads around the story? I'm seeing a Car Fax ad, an ad for a movie, a t-shirt company ad, some other google ads and some ads promoting other BBC properties.

I can't speak for grandparent poster, but when I read the article, it seemed like it was more advertisement than journalism. So it passes the duck test. It doesn't really matter to me if anyone actually paid BBC to run the story, because to me , it is at least 51% advertisement and no more than 49% news story.

If this were filed under World News, I would agree. But it's in the business section and they run lots of stories like this. It's one notch more newsy than the entertainment section.

Re: How the Instant Pot cooker developed a cult following

#298
post #233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Water heaters have many times the risk of exploding, and nobody blinks. Its strange how cookers got that reputation.

Presumably it's because people typically don't stand near water heaters, so there's less risk of injury in the event of an explosion.

http://citywideplumbingpros.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/w...

Re: How the Instant Pot cooker developed a cult following

#299

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can't speak for grandparent poster, but when I read the article, it seemed like it was more advertisement than journalism. So it passes the duck test. It doesn't really matter to me if anyone actually paid BBC to run the story, because to me , it is at least 51% advertisement and no more than 49% news story.

If this were filed under World News , I would agree. But it's in the business section and they run lots of stories like this. It's one notch more newsy than the entertainment section.

And I usually consider the entertainment section of anything to be more than 80% advertisement. If you usually run an ad-blocker on your browser, make sure you also have an ad-blocker running in your brain. The more passive you are about your information sources, the more likely it is that someone could use one to push one of their ideas on you.

Having worn a foil hat for a while myself, I still find occasion to put it back on every once in a while. Question everything. Never stop asking yourself how you really know what you think you know.

In life, like in software, never trust your inputs.

Re: How the Instant Pot cooker developed a cult following

#300

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because here you have two settings/ways 1) Steam is contained inside and not released 2) Steam is released So rather than x whistles it based on the time. For example for one cup of Toor dal (Yellow peas / pigeon peas spilt ) we put it for 16minutes with steam valve closed.

so, its a trial and error way to figure out the time equivalent of whistles?

Already many people tried and have a pretty good documented time. So it will work.
Post reply on HN