Live data from Hacker News

Wired's iPad edition arrives, converted from Flash by Adobe

appleinsider.com

1–10 of 26 posts

Re: Wired's iPad edition arrives, converted from Flash by Adobe

#4
So we have:

Translated from Flash to Objective-C by hand: OK

Translated from Flash to Objective-C by computer program: Not OK

The good news, I guess, is that Apple is apparently confirming that "originally written in Objective-C" doesn't mean "the first concrete representation of the program was in Objective-C", which means people are free to prototype an app in whatever language they want, as long as they totally rewrite it in Objective-C by hand.

Re: Wired's iPad edition arrives, converted from Flash by Adobe

#5
post #4

So we have: Translated from Flash to Objective-C by hand: OK Translated from Flash to Objective-C by computer program: Not OK The good news, I guess, is that Apple is apparently confirming that "originally written in Objective-C" doesn't mean "the first concrete representation of the program was in Objective-C", which means people are free to prototype an app in whatever language they want, as long as they totally re…

> Translated from Flash to Objective-C by computer program: Not OK

Assuming you're referring to the CS5 feature, it converts Flash to byte-code, not Objective-C.

Re: Wired's iPad edition arrives, converted from Flash by Adobe

#6
The original cross-compile from AIR may have had its own optimization issues. But oh, the irony if the speed at which Adobe has had to port this to Objective-C has resulted in a more sluggish app!

Fortunately, it looks like the native app is actually an improvement. Look at the video from February: http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/02/the-wired-ipad-app-a-... The paging, zooming, and scrolling really does look smoother to me.

Re: Wired's iPad edition arrives, converted from Flash by Adobe

#7
TBH, I think 5$/issue is a bit steep. In Canada I currently pay 40$/yr for my print subscription and I know that an American Print subscription is 20$/yr, so the price difference is pretty substantial.

I will be keeping my print subscription until prices are more reasonable.

Re: Wired's iPad edition arrives, converted from Flash by Adobe

#8
post #4

So we have: Translated from Flash to Objective-C by hand: OK Translated from Flash to Objective-C by computer program: Not OK The good news, I guess, is that Apple is apparently confirming that "originally written in Objective-C" doesn't mean "the first concrete representation of the program was in Objective-C", which means people are free to prototype an app in whatever language they want, as long as they totally re…

No we don't, we have:

Rewritten in Objective-C: OK

Translated from Flash to Objective-C by computer program: Not OK

It's like the difference between hiring a translator and using Google translate or hiring a typist versus using speech recognition.

[Edited for clarity: meant to change translated by hand to rewritten by intelligent human, and keep the second one the same].

Re: Wired's iPad edition arrives, converted from Flash by Adobe

#9
post #7

TBH, I think 5$/issue is a bit steep. In Canada I currently pay 40$/yr for my print subscription and I know that an American Print subscription is 20$/yr, so the price difference is pretty substantial. I will be keeping my print subscription until prices are more reasonable.

I'm in the same boat, $40/year as a Canuck.

I'd like both, and would pay $60/year for that.

I'm expecting Wired will do something that motivates current print subscribers to keep the magazine and also grab the iPad version.

That said, the iPad experience is really nice. It's a hefty download as all the media is included (like the Toy Story 3 clip on the front page), but it's so well done.

Re: Wired's iPad edition arrives, converted from Flash by Adobe

#10
post #4

So we have: Translated from Flash to Objective-C by hand: OK Translated from Flash to Objective-C by computer program: Not OK The good news, I guess, is that Apple is apparently confirming that "originally written in Objective-C" doesn't mean "the first concrete representation of the program was in Objective-C", which means people are free to prototype an app in whatever language they want, as long as they totally re…

No we don't, we have: Rewritten in Objective-C: OK Translated from Flash to Objective-C by computer program: Not OK It's like the difference between hiring a translator and using Google translate or hiring a typist versus using speech recognition. [Edited for clarity: meant to change translated by hand to rewritten by intelligent human, and keep the second one the same].

I don't see how "Machine translation" is any different than "Translated from Flash to Objective-C by computer program".
Post reply on HN