Live data from Hacker News

Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

vultr.com

81–90 of 123 posts

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#81

I use Vultr mainly because it has an AU presence, whereas Linode, DO, Scaleway, OVH, do not.

OVH is currently building a datacenter in AU. I guess (hope) I some point they will offer their vps/cloud there as well. But so far their pricing is higher there then EU/CA.

https://www.ovh.com/us/discover/australia.xml

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#82

The Vultr plan looks like a nice option. For comparison, I recently started using Scaleway for my it's-so-cheap-why-not-try-it box. My Scaleway box's specs: - €2.99/month (currently $3.17 USD/month) - 2 GB RAM - 50 GB SSD storage - 200 Mbits/sec of unmetered bandwidth - data centers in Amsterdam & Paris When I need to take hosting more seriously, I'll reevaluate. Until then, Scaleway is a damn good deal :)

This is a great box, I use one myself but people need to know that SSD is network attached which comes with its own slowness. It's OK it's just something you need to be aware of.

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#83
post #63

I'm happy Vultr customer and I can only be happier. I was looking for other providers recently for my personal needs, as I don't need that much resources and there were other providers with less that $5/month prices, but now I'm not looking anywhere. Sweetest thing is hourly pricing. Sometimes I need Paris VPN for few hours. I have some scripts, so I can launch new instance with configured OpenVPN in 2-3 minutes, use…

I'm curious why you'd need a specific VPN for a few hours? Get around streaming restrictions?

I'm playing WoW and sometimes something goes wrong with my ping from Astana to Frankfurt (where WoW servers are located), but Paris still works fine. So VPN solves that problem.

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#84

I'm happy Vultr customer and I can only be happier. I was looking for other providers recently for my personal needs, as I don't need that much resources and there were other providers with less that $5/month prices, but now I'm not looking anywhere. Sweetest thing is hourly pricing. Sometimes I need Paris VPN for few hours. I have some scripts, so I can launch new instance with configured OpenVPN in 2-3 minutes, use…

Do you have to recreate the entire system each time? That's one of the downsides to Digital Ocean for me, you need to pay even when you're not actually running your droplet.

I'm recreating the entire system each time. Basically they copy predefined CentOS image, then running my post-install script which installs OpenVPN and copies some configuration files. It's quite fast in the end.

I think, you can snapshot the entire system, then delete server and recreate it from that snapshot later.

But yes, if you're just stopping server, you'll pay for it.

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#85

The Vultr plan looks like a nice option. For comparison, I recently started using Scaleway for my it's-so-cheap-why-not-try-it box. My Scaleway box's specs: - €2.99/month (currently $3.17 USD/month) - 2 GB RAM - 50 GB SSD storage - 200 Mbits/sec of unmetered bandwidth - data centers in Amsterdam & Paris When I need to take hosting more seriously, I'll reevaluate. Until then, Scaleway is a damn good deal :)

So when you try out one of these hosts do you worry about bandwidth overages? Or are the options to manage or cut off the instance if it goes over. I guess I'm interested in what other costs beyond the monthly keep-it-alive fee can come up with this tier of hosting

I've got a few things running on $3/mo Scaleway boxes. Bandwidth is unmetered and 200Mbit/sec. The only extra cost I pay for is additional storage volumes (50gb included, additional 1 euro per 50 GB/month) - other than that, dead reliable and all inclusive.

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#87
post #75

I don't have any experience with Vultr, nor do I know anyone who has. Honestly, I haven't heard of them before. Anyone have experience with them? I'd love to hear about it.

I saw this a while ago: https://storify.com/phoul/vultr-tampering . Unsure what to make of it really but it's made me somewhat wary of Vultr.

That's... weird, actually. I'm inclined to think that this is incompetence rather than malice, if only because as malice its extraordinary incompetent. I mean, what would the point even be? I would think it's a MITM, but they already control the hypervisor, so I can't imagine any sort of compromise that isn't completely trivial to implement invisibly.

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#88
post #7

I was setting up a test vps there a couple of days ago and made plans to try out the $5 plan with $20 credit they were giving me on a $5 charge. So I had a runway of about 5 months but when I made payment, this $2.50 plan was right there, and it wasn't there before the payment. Now I have 10 month trial period. Never been happier. The dashboard is nice, the ram is a bit low (but the price point is killer), I wasn't a…

> I wasn't able to deploy a lets encrypt cert without pooled memory. You mean you had to enable swap to run the Let's Encrypt client?

Yeah right swap memory. I'm a server management newbie. This was a cent os instance and apparently it didn't have a native certbot so I had to use certbot auto.

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#89

I recently switched to Vultr from a DigitalOcean and Compose.io setup. Compose is nice for backups and replicas but they drop the connection like all the time and then the replicas start playing who wants to be master. Which brought downtime to my application at times. Also there expensive so I said f that and manage a Mongo instance myself. Since it was a small project that had to much overhead. I moved from DO was…

I'd be curious to see the historical downtime of the Miami DC given that its in the direct path of a yearly hurricane season.

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#90
post #41
post #15

Today I published an article where I've benchmarked and reviewed most "simple" cloud hosting providers (Vultr, DO, Linode, Scaleway, OVH): https://www.webstack.de/blog/e/cloud-hosting-provider-compar... Edit: I've submitted it as well: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13798023

Do you know why AMS is faster than FRA (ping- and speed-wise), although FRA is quite a lot closer to me physically? What was your experience since you are in Germany too?

It might be cheaper to route your packets far away and then back.

I remember being on an independent ISP (VDSL reseller), and my neighbor down the street was on the incumbent Cable provider. When I did a traceroute, I discovered my packets were being routed across the country, south, across the country again, and back north, before getting to my neighbor.

Post reply on HN