Live data from Hacker News

Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

vultr.com

41–50 of 123 posts

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#41
post #15

Today I published an article where I've benchmarked and reviewed most "simple" cloud hosting providers (Vultr, DO, Linode, Scaleway, OVH): https://www.webstack.de/blog/e/cloud-hosting-provider-compar... Edit: I've submitted it as well: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13798023

Do you know why AMS is faster than FRA (ping- and speed-wise), although FRA is quite a lot closer to me physically?

What was your experience since you are in Germany too?

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#42
post #41
post #15

Today I published an article where I've benchmarked and reviewed most "simple" cloud hosting providers (Vultr, DO, Linode, Scaleway, OVH): https://www.webstack.de/blog/e/cloud-hosting-provider-compar... Edit: I've submitted it as well: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13798023

Do you know why AMS is faster than FRA (ping- and speed-wise), although FRA is quite a lot closer to me physically? What was your experience since you are in Germany too?

What's your ISP?

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#44
post #37
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would you mind sharing the technicalities of splitting requests for your blog across 3 providers? Is the 'load balancing' part done at the DNS level?

Yes—full details at http://blog.zorinaq.com/release-of-hablog-and-new-design/ Don't forget to lower your TTL to make it work decently.

Merci bien.

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#45

I don't have any experience with Vultr, nor do I know anyone who has. Honestly, I haven't heard of them before. Anyone have experience with them? I'd love to hear about it.

I ran https://precursorapp.com on Vultr in the early days. I had a setup with a few dedicated servers for the DB and load balancer, and then I would spin up and shut down application servers whenever I deployed new backend code. Infrastructure looked like: https://precursor.precursorapp.com/document/Backend-Infrastr... I used to recommend it to everybody, but don't any longer. I had two negative experiences that made…

Thanks for this comment. I was about tell my team to investigate Vultr as an option for our next website, but I guess we'll first do some more research into this.

We're still on AWS too. Currently spending about $50 / site which adds up quite quickly when you have 20+ sites. Our current breakup is something like (2 x t2.micro - one for website, one for cron created using Elastic Beanstalk, 1 x db.t2.micro for RDS + Elastic load balancer cost). I'm sure we can bring it down to $10 / site if we were to move to Vultr or Scaleway but it's a very small site to pay for the reliability AWS has provided to us all these years (apart the recent S3 outage). So guess we'll too just stick to AWS for now until.

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#46
post #24

I don't have any experience with Vultr, nor do I know anyone who has. Honestly, I haven't heard of them before. Anyone have experience with them? I'd love to hear about it.

I've just had one small $5 VPS with them for about a year now. No downtime, no complaints. Since my needs are so basic I think I could probably get away with one of these $2.50 offerings, however the problem - and it's the only problem I've run in to with Vultr so far - is that downgrading VPS plans isn't possible. You can only go up.

Why not spin up a new one and recreate your configuration? Only weak point is if they don't let you move the IP

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#47
Just migrated from the old $5 plan to the new $2.50 plan which even has more SSD space. Unfortunately, that involved copying a snapshot to a new instance, because they don't support "downgrading", though in this particular case there was no technical reason to not support it directly.

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#48
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They do accept paypal and bitcoin, if you don't want to give them your credit card information

Last time I tried that they needed a card on file to pay with bitcoin. Sigh.

According to their site you need to either link a credit card or add 5$ credit via paypal in order to use bitcoin

"Account must be funded by credit card or PayPal before making a Bitcoin deposit."

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#49
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Last time I tried that they needed a card on file to pay with bitcoin. Sigh.

According to their site you need to either link a credit card or add 5$ credit via paypal in order to use bitcoin "Account must be funded by credit card or PayPal before making a Bitcoin deposit."

That is quite possibly the most stupidest fucking thing I've ever heard in my life.

Re: Vultr introduces $2.50/month plan

#50

It's nice to see all this competition ($5 Linode, now $2.5 Vultr) but don't they risk overallocaton? Let's say they have physical machines with 96 GB mem that hold 200 1 GB VMs each, in the hope that no one uses more than half their ram. Same for CPU or disk I/O or whatever resource. Now that the entry level prices are dropping but the offered resources remains the same, people will spin up more VMs. Doesn't it becom…

Linode, DigitalOcean and Vultr actually bill whether the VM is on or off and they lock your RAM to your VM so overallocation doesn't happen.
Post reply on HN