The Unix-Haters Handbook (1994) [pdf]
web.mit.edu
The Unix-Haters Handbook (1994) [pdf]
1–10 of 316 posts
Re: The Unix-Haters Handbook (1994) [pdf]
#2This is a good read. Especially if you use Linux/BSD/OSX on a fairly regular basis.
While it is mostly long usenet rants about the _failure_ of Unix. There is some grains of truth buried in 80's-esque proto-shit-posting.
Re: The Unix-Haters Handbook (1994) [pdf]
#3If I ever need to feel good about myself as a software developer, I only ever need to read this book's chapter about the X window system.
Re: The Unix-Haters Handbook (1994) [pdf]
#4The question is: what would the ideal non-POSIX API look like?
Re: The Unix-Haters Handbook (1994) [pdf]
#5can anyone give a first-hand historical perspective on this, regarding what was going on and how this was seen in 1994?
Re: The Unix-Haters Handbook (1994) [pdf]
#6If I ever need to feel good about myself as a software developer, I only ever need to read this book's chapter about the X window system.
Yeah but try and figure out how you'd do better... efficient.ly. Over the network...
Re: The Unix-Haters Handbook (1994) [pdf]
#7While entertaining, I'm left with the following question: if not UNIX, then what?
Are there any successful non-UNIX-y OSes that are worth checking out?
I may embarrass myself here, but I was under the impression that BSD, Plan 9, Solaris and HP-UX were all UNIX-y ...
Re: The Unix-Haters Handbook (1994) [pdf]
#8This book is one of my top three books on how to become a good software dev :)
Re: The Unix-Haters Handbook (1994) [pdf]
#9Re: The Unix-Haters Handbook (1994) [pdf]
#10While entertaining, I'm left with the following question: if not UNIX, then what? Are there any successful non-UNIX-y OSes that are worth checking out? I may embarrass myself here, but I was under the impression that BSD, Plan 9, Solaris and HP-UX were all UNIX-y ...
I think the important thing to accept is just because something is the best option we have, doesn't mean it couldn't be significantly improved -- I feel each of bash, vim and Emacs fall into this category, in their own way.