In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares

#1

Post by coloneltcb » Tue, Feb 28, 2017, 8:43 PM UTC

Re: In Video, Uber CEO Argues with Driver Over Falling Fares

#2

Post by brotherjerky » Tue, Feb 28, 2017, 9:00 PM UTC

Perhaps they need to hire Sally Yates or John Ashcroft to get to the bottom of this now?

#3

Post by jforman » Tue, Feb 28, 2017, 9:01 PM UTC

Travis and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Quarter for PR

#4

Post by VMG » Tue, Feb 28, 2017, 9:03 PM UTC

jforman wrote: post #3

Travis and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Quarter for PR

Maybe they are flushing out the bad stories that are out there?

#5

Post by envy2 » Tue, Feb 28, 2017, 9:04 PM UTC

Unfortunately, that driver is about to find out what "two party consent" for recordings means.

#6

Post by [deleted] » Tue, Feb 28, 2017, 9:05 PM UTC

[deleted]

#7

Post by B1narySunset » Tue, Feb 28, 2017, 9:05 PM UTC

This guy comes across as a quintessential douche.

#8

Post by koolba » Tue, Feb 28, 2017, 9:06 PM UTC

envy2 wrote: post #5

Unfortunately, that driver is about to find out what "two party consent" for recordings means.

Does that apply to being recorded in a public location (and would the driver's cab count)?

Also, for all we know there could be a sign in the black car that says, "Smile you're on candid camera!".

#9

Post by NTDF9 » Tue, Feb 28, 2017, 9:07 PM UTC

How can a driver lose $97000?

Not asking in support/opposition of uber. Genuinely curious about what are some ways drivers could get into so much trouble?

#10

Post by coloneltcb » Tue, Feb 28, 2017, 9:07 PM UTC

envy2 wrote: post #5

Unfortunately, that driver is about to find out what "two party consent" for recordings means.

No, I think Travis has enough bad PR now. He doesn't need to punch down and sue a driver he's already bankrupted