I hate the nickle and dime approach to productivity. In fact, the happier I am the more I get done.
The Tragic Cost of Google Pac-Man – 4.82 million hours
41–50 of 65 posts
Re: The Tragic Cost of Google Pac-Man – 4.82 million hours
#42Re: The Tragic Cost of Google Pac-Man – 4.82 million hours
#43Re: The Tragic Cost of Google Pac-Man – 4.82 million hours
#44Re: The Tragic Cost of Google Pac-Man – 4.82 million hours
#45Re: The Tragic Cost of Google Pac-Man – 4.82 million hours
#46Re: The Tragic Cost of Google Pac-Man – 4.82 million hours
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've probably overstated myself a bit, whilst failing to explain my opinion well because I was writing from an emotional response. Dinking around online is lunch-time behaviour. If you really have nothing to do, why not take the initiative and do something productive for your employer instead of fooling around on the net? The occasional 5 minutes probably doesn't hurt, but that doesn't make it right either... an hour…
I guess it depends on what work you do. If I worked a 100% of the day, except for lunch break, my brain would be fried after a few days. 5 minutes an hour doing something else actually makes me more productive. Sure, when I'm in the zone and are lucky enough not to get interrupted I can program for longer periods of time, but I still need a short break now and then. I don't know where you worked, and since I'm from a…
I live in the UK there are two standard formats for most grunt work - either 2 hrs work 15 mins break 2hrs work 1hr break UNPAID (i suspect not allowed - i think this depends on a legal loophole against the spirit of the law) 2hrs work 15 mins break 2hrs work - or 8 hours with just 30 minutes paid break to be taken in one consecutive lump. i've worked both - its still nothing compared to what most of the world (i.e. China, India and Africa) deal with. I'm one of the very most privileged...
Whilst you work discipline can be illegally strict because it is accepted and nobody questions things if "80% of places I worked were like this - they can't all be illegal" or "its been this way for years" or "big companies know better than to break the law" etc. I'm one of the fortunates with sufficient balls to stand up for myself - even then I don't do it every time that I probably should, but I've seen so many people (the vast majority) treated illegally because it is accepted by their peers, and they just tolerate it. When you explain how they can protect themselves they don't want to because they need the money and don't want to tick anyone off, job security really matters when people tell you you are unskilled and jobs are hard to find - it doesn't matter how many times I tell them I've never been fired for standing up for myself.
Its one of my personal pet peeves - hence the irrationally strong response to, at best, a vaguely related link.
Re: The Tragic Cost of Google Pac-Man – 4.82 million hours
#48Re: The Tragic Cost of Google Pac-Man – 4.82 million hours
#49504,703,000 Are there really half a billion people online? (let online visiting google on a particular day)
Re: The Tragic Cost of Google Pac-Man – 4.82 million hours
#50If so, what? One possibility is to see if increasing engagement time during a visit has any effects like increased ad conversions or increased time spent on consecutive sessions.