Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well the spacecraft will be tested multiple times before this mission and there are health and fitness tests before departure just like it says there. Both of those were addressed, I think you may have misread this.
You're right I misread the testing part. I'd very much still like to know who those people are and what their thought process is.
SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
111–120 of 513 posts
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure everyone will see it that way. One could look at it as taking the whole "wasteful private jet" to the extreme. Think of the sheer amount of fuel burned in the earth's atmosphere so a rich guy can fly in space. At least, I expect many will spin it that way.
Isn't the exhaust just water?!?
The Shuttle and the new Space Launch System will use hydrogen/LOX, which exhausts basically water vapor.
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#113https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/science/nasa-looks-to-spe...
Is Musk still maintaining a relationship with Trump? When Uber founder Travis Kalanick left Trump's business council, Musk was still on it AFAIK. I wonder if Musk is doing this or announcing it for related reasons. Certainly Trump has a history, even in his short tenure, of pressuring businesses into announcements that suit his agenda. And the announcement seems to fit Trump's pattern: Impossible, brazen bravado. (Musk gives the impossible some credibility, but that's what is meant by lending someone your credibility.)
It's speculative, but it's also sad and a bad sign when we must look for government interference in the free market at this level, to provide propaganda for the President.
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure everyone will see it that way. One could look at it as taking the whole "wasteful private jet" to the extreme. Think of the sheer amount of fuel burned in the earth's atmosphere so a rich guy can fly in space. At least, I expect many will spin it that way.
Isn't the exhaust just water?!?
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure everyone will see it that way. One could look at it as taking the whole "wasteful private jet" to the extreme. Think of the sheer amount of fuel burned in the earth's atmosphere so a rich guy can fly in space. At least, I expect many will spin it that way.
Isn't the exhaust just water?!?
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same! I also think that spending money on a roundtrip to the moon is way better for humanity than spending it on champagne, caviar and cars.
Not sure everyone will see it that way. One could look at it as taking the whole "wasteful private jet" to the extreme. Think of the sheer amount of fuel burned in the earth's atmosphere so a rich guy can fly in space. At least, I expect many will spin it that way.
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
> That's an incredibly aggressive timeline Sometimes i wonder if that's an strategy from the management team to put pressure in the engineers.
In the same way that hitting a stuck bolt with a hammer is a strategy. It applies pressure sure, but you break your tools and the nut gets stripped. It seems to a preferred motivation method though.
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#118Is it still a thing, where going to space makes you infertile due to radiation? I feel like I remember basically once you go into space (male or female) kids are off the table afterwards unless you have frozen your sperm or eggs beforehand. Not sure if that was solved at some point or not.
When you get interplanetary, like on a trip to Mars, radiation exposure becomes arguable the most difficult problem to solve.
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably not a ton of extra space for a multi-day trip?
That's probably it. Not as much space I think, but life support for an extended period of time. This is one key difference between Dragon/CST-100 and Orion: the latter is designed for extended deep space travel with full crew, and can support them accordingly, while the former are primarily LEO taxis with more limited deep space capabilities.
The difference is that Orion cost about as much as Dragon 1, Dragon 2, Falcon and Falcon Heavy combined. If we add the cost of a SLS launch it goes into another dimension of cost.
Re: SpaceX to Send Privately Crewed Dragon Spacecraft Beyond the Moon Next Year
#120So, hmm, we wants to send people around the moon, a year and a half from now, with a rocket he never tested and with a capsule that never flew? I expect half of the directors of SpaceX to resign in the next two days...