> I am afraid to make my name public. Let’s call me Amy. For reasons only the #ubervictims know, let’s refer to the villain of this story as Mike#2. My default is "show me the evidence", but I believe Susan Fowler's account because she put her reputation on the line and I was willing to trust that she left, opposed to got fired, due to non-performance reasons based on being able to somewhat approximate/confirm her te…
I am an Uber survivor
111–120 of 841 posts
Re: I am an Uber survivor
#112Why would someone write an anonymous blog post but then declare that they are: 1) A woman in her late 20s 2) Who used to work at Uber in Engineering working on database and networking scalability 3) Went to a top private college 4) has a Masters in Information Systems 5) previous to Uber worked as a Data Analyst in a tech company in the Midwest and left when it was acquired by a Chinese firm 6) Is 5 foot 7 Caucasian…
People like you are the problem.
Re: I am an Uber survivor
#113OMFG
I don't know if this is real or not, but given how Uber acts publicly about everything else (breaking the laws until governments are forced to amend the laws for Uber), I'm not surprised at all if this really is the overall attitude that they have for everything.
Re: I am an Uber survivor
#114Re: I am an Uber survivor
#115Yet again the nerds have become the bullies.
Except I doubt these are "the nerds". These are likely the fratboys who studied business and are continuing their hazing and misogyny as managers after college.
Sounds to me like it was her team members also.
Re: I am an Uber survivor
#116Sounds like someone who cant take the heat at the office. Grow a pair of balls Amy.
Re: I am an Uber survivor
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except I doubt these are "the nerds". These are likely the fratboys who studied business and are continuing their hazing and misogyny as managers after college.
I am also assuming some fancy MBA jerk.
Re: I am an Uber survivor
#118Re: I am an Uber survivor
#119Re: I am an Uber survivor
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
The genius of labeling it "human resources" just struck me. As an employee (and human) it seems reasonable to interpret it as "resources for humans" and thus assume it would be there to help. But its true meaning, to execs/stakeholders/corporate persons, is "[the department which manages the] human resources".
This is not really an obscure secret. Wikipedia: “Human resources are the people who make up the workforce of an organization, business sector, or economy. [...] A human-resources department (HR department) of an organization performs human resource management, overseeing various aspects of employment, such as compliance with labour law and employment standards, administration of employee benefits, and some aspects o…