981–990 of 1001 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was expecting this: Thousands of years from now, when biological life on this planet is all but extinct and superintelligent AI evolving at incomprehensible rates roam the planet, taviso will still be finding 0-days impacting billions of machines on an hourly basis. Be glad that Google is employing him and not some random intelligence agency.
I have huge respect for taviso and his team. Their track record in security work is so impressive. They are without a doubt extremely capable. However, I am always wondering: are they really globally unique in their work and skill? So that they are really the ones finding all the security holes before anyone else does because they are just so much better (and/or with better infrastructure) than anyone else? Or is it…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google, Microsoft Bing, Yahoo, DDG, Baidu, Yandex, and more. The caches other than Google were quick to clear and we've not been able to find active data on them any longer. We have a team that is continuing to search these and other potential caches online and our support team has been briefed to forward any reports immediately to this team. I agree it's troubling that Google is taking so long. We were working with…
Matthew, with all due respect, you don't know what you're talking about. view-source: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=&d=4857656909960944&w=rj9cg... view-source: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=&d=4901023173710126&w=n3mEZ... view-source: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=&d=4558611265887320&w=urwoW... view-source: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=&d=4592983872701813&w=Ghwdd... view-source: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.…
20 hours since this post and these entries are still up ...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
jgrahamc: can you list which public caches you worked with to attempt to address this? It does not inspire confidence when even google is still showing obvious results
Google, Microsoft Bing, Yahoo, DDG, Baidu, Yandex, and more. The caches other than Google were quick to clear and we've not been able to find active data on them any longer. We have a team that is continuing to search these and other potential caches online and our support team has been briefed to forward any reports immediately to this team. I agree it's troubling that Google is taking so long. We were working with…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
jgrahamc: can you list which public caches you worked with to attempt to address this? It does not inspire confidence when even google is still showing obvious results
Google, Microsoft Bing, Yahoo, DDG, Baidu, Yandex, and more. The caches other than Google were quick to clear and we've not been able to find active data on them any longer. We have a team that is continuing to search these and other potential caches online and our support team has been briefed to forward any reports immediately to this team. I agree it's troubling that Google is taking so long. We were working with…
I will be migrating away from your service first thing Monday. I will not use you services again and will ensure that my clients and colleagues are informed of you horrific business practices now and in the future.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google cleaning this up is going to take a ton of man-hours, which will cost a LOT of money. How much money is Google obligated to spend to help a competitor who fucked up? Are they supposed to just drop everything else and make this the top priority?
I don't see this as them as helping a competitor. The damage has been done (in terms of customer relations). I view leaving up the cached copy of leaked data as being a jerk move - not towards CloudFare, but to anyone whose data was leaked. This is an opportunity for Google to show what they do with rather sensitive data leaks - do they leave them up or scrub them? Had damage from the leak been aleady done (to those…
This is not the case; it is not obvious, trivial, or easy to delete the leaked data. It is not simple to find it all. This is not like they are being given a URL and being asked to clear the cached version of it; they are being asked to search through millions of pages for possibly leaked content.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google, Microsoft Bing, Yahoo, DDG, Baidu, Yandex, and more. The caches other than Google were quick to clear and we've not been able to find active data on them any longer. We have a team that is continuing to search these and other potential caches online and our support team has been briefed to forward any reports immediately to this team. I agree it's troubling that Google is taking so long. We were working with…
Matthew, with all due respect, you don't know what you're talking about. view-source: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=&d=4857656909960944&w=rj9cg... view-source: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=&d=4901023173710126&w=n3mEZ... view-source: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=&d=4558611265887320&w=urwoW... view-source: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=&d=4592983872701813&w=Ghwdd... view-source: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
jgrahamc: can you list which public caches you worked with to attempt to address this? It does not inspire confidence when even google is still showing obvious results
Google, Microsoft Bing, Yahoo, DDG, Baidu, Yandex, and more. The caches other than Google were quick to clear and we've not been able to find active data on them any longer. We have a team that is continuing to search these and other potential caches online and our support team has been briefed to forward any reports immediately to this team. I agree it's troubling that Google is taking so long. We were working with…
I'm no longer using CF for my own projects, but you've just cemented my decision that none of my clients will either.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google, Microsoft Bing, Yahoo, DDG, Baidu, Yandex, and more. The caches other than Google were quick to clear and we've not been able to find active data on them any longer. We have a team that is continuing to search these and other potential caches online and our support team has been briefed to forward any reports immediately to this team. I agree it's troubling that Google is taking so long. We were working with…
Matthew, with all due respect, you don't know what you're talking about. view-source: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=&d=4857656909960944&w=rj9cg... view-source: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=&d=4901023173710126&w=n3mEZ... view-source: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=&d=4558611265887320&w=urwoW... view-source: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=&d=4592983872701813&w=Ghwdd... view-source: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most of those booters are on their free tier, so it's a bit hard to argue it's a racket. If you want to claim it's unethical... maybe. But if you think about it from their position, it could genuinely get into a slippery slope if you start policing what services you're reverse proxying. Especially considering the rate they're growing now. Think of it this way: should Google be compelled to remove all search results f…
Google already does that: https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/safebrowsing/ https://www.stopbadware.org/blacklisted-by-google
Cloudflare, like Google, does have a similar program and does remove websites that are directly hosting malware or phishing pages. They just don't remove the gray-area stuff, like hacking forums and black market customer portals.