Its been said before, but needs to be repeated every time: The implications of this line of R&D are horrific. Removing the risk of say, US soldier casualties, combined with media control, and with "merely" the current level of inhumanity of political leadership, would be a very ugly mix indeed. So yeah, its hard for me to get excited about the tech in this case.
The latest version of the LittleDog robot
41–50 of 66 posts
Re: The latest version of the LittleDog robot
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're only horrific if they're misused. Robots like this will also have plenty of non-military applications - especially in agriculture. Legged locomotion opens up the possibility of cultivating land which was previously inaccessible to conventional farming automation. It should also be said that there is nothing inevitable about the close association between robotics and the military - it's just an artefact of Ame…
They're only horrific if they're misused. Given that this whole line of research is funded by the US military, what do you mean by "misused" ? Wouldn't "used" be more accurate?
Use of robots for the purpose of prosecuting a war crime
Use of robots to carry out an act of terrorism
Indiscriminate use of deadly force by autonomous robots
Use of autonomous robots in a military context without proper supervision (for example, not being able to deactivate them once deployed).
Re: The latest version of the LittleDog robot
#43honestly this is just frightening.
Re: The latest version of the LittleDog robot
#44Why can't it move 10x or 100x faster? Is speed constrained by computation or something else?
Re: The latest version of the LittleDog robot
#45Re: The latest version of the LittleDog robot
#46I find amazing how difficult it is to successfully perform apparently trivial tasks such as walking. There's more information about the 'LittleDog' on the Boston Dynamics website: http://www.bostondynamics.com/ I was really impressed 2 years ago by their video of the 'BigDog': http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1czBcnX1Ww (check out t=40s)
I find it amazing HN readers believe walking is a trivial task.
Re: The latest version of the LittleDog robot
#47honestly this is just frightening.
I personally find unseen UAV's raining missiles down on our heads to be much more terrifying. I'm actually quite excited about this tech. The first thing I thought when I saw this video was one of these things walking on the surface of Mars.
A walking robot is much less terrifying.
The first thing I thought was that countries such as Cambodia could one day exist without landmines.
Re: The latest version of the LittleDog robot
#48Can someone link to a good introduction to how the control systems for something like this work?
Re: The latest version of the LittleDog robot
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unlike the A-bomb which is lovely. Or the decidedly low-tech genocide in Sudan. Or the genocides and crimes against humanity in all the other places. Bottom line is Homo homini lupus . It's not like the risk of US soldier casualties is that much of deterrent. Bombs, A-bombs, robots, not that different, the more things change, the more they stay the same.
So existence of A-bomb or low-tech genocide somehow justifies creation of new means to kill people?