Gcc: Internal Compiler Error Bug Known for 10+ Years
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Gcc: Internal Compiler Error Bug Known for 10+ Years
#2Re: Gcc: Internal Compiler Error Bug Known for 10+ Years
#3Re: Gcc: Internal Compiler Error Bug Known for 10+ Years
#4So?
Re: Gcc: Internal Compiler Error Bug Known for 10+ Years
#5Re: Gcc: Internal Compiler Error Bug Known for 10+ Years
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you think a post is inappropriate for HN, please flag it and move on.
Not at all. I was hoping for additional background and context. Any particular reason to highlight this bug today?
A comment consisting of the single word "So?" is dismissive, particularly in a text-only environment devoid of tone of voice or body language. It doesn't convey any of the interest you've shown in your follow-up.
Re: Gcc: Internal Compiler Error Bug Known for 10+ Years
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not at all. I was hoping for additional background and context. Any particular reason to highlight this bug today?
Other than announcement posts, I think HN members general post submissions whenever they come across them. Looking at the bug report, it was updated today, so it likely caught someone's eye. A comment consisting of the single word "So?" is dismissive, particularly in a text-only environment devoid of tone of voice or body language. It doesn't convey any of the interest you've shown in your follow-up.
Re: Gcc: Internal Compiler Error Bug Known for 10+ Years
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
Other than announcement posts, I think HN members general post submissions whenever they come across them. Looking at the bug report, it was updated today, so it likely caught someone's eye. A comment consisting of the single word "So?" is dismissive, particularly in a text-only environment devoid of tone of voice or body language. It doesn't convey any of the interest you've shown in your follow-up.
The title chosen by the OP is devoid of tone of voice or body language too. To me, the OPs phrasing seems borderline negative. Sounds like OP is either ridiculing the project for not fixing a bug for 10 years or perhaps OP thinks a bug fix is owed to them.
However, the title of the submission is beside the point. All of the things you're including now would have been great as part of your initial comment. None of that is conveyed in "So?".