CNN, NY Times and other news outlets blocked from attending White House gaggle
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: CNN, NY Times and other news outlets blocked from attending White House gaggle
#2CNN surely will not be most impartial reporting this so if anyone with knowledge would comment - what's the deal with this? Is there a historic precedent? What's a gaggle?
Re: CNN, NY Times and other news outlets blocked from attending White House gaggle
#3CNN surely will not be most impartial reporting this so if anyone with knowledge would comment - what's the deal with this? Is there a historic precedent? What's a gaggle?
Would it even matter if there's precedent? Why shouldn't the White House get to choose who can attend events of any kind?
Re: CNN, NY Times and other news outlets blocked from attending White House gaggle
#4CNN surely will not be most impartial reporting this so if anyone with knowledge would comment - what's the deal with this? Is there a historic precedent? What's a gaggle?
Would it even matter if there's precedent? Why shouldn't the White House get to choose who can attend events of any kind?
Because free speech?
Re: CNN, NY Times and other news outlets blocked from attending White House gaggle
#5Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would it even matter if there's precedent? Why shouldn't the White House get to choose who can attend events of any kind?
Because free speech?
I've read the amendment over and over again, but I keep missing the part that says you have to let journalists into a press conference. Can you point it out to me?