This is dumb. This is awesome: http://ukijs.org/mail/index.html
Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
21–28 of 28 posts
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#22Maybe a disclaimer in the title that it only works in Safari on Macs, so linux users don't waste their time clicking?
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#23It would have been nice if they didn't use so many -webkit- properties (I counted 34) so that other browsers could at least have a shot at rendering it. Several properties they use are supported by Opera if given the chance.
It's hardly "built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3" if they're using proprietary -webkit- properties rather than CSS3 properties.
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#24It would have been nice if they didn't use so many -webkit- properties (I counted 34) so that other browsers could at least have a shot at rendering it. Several properties they use are supported by Opera if given the chance.
It's hardly "built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3" if they're using proprietary -webkit- properties rather than CSS3 properties.
sice CSS3 is still a work in progress browsers implement upcomig features using -webkit/-o/-moz there's nothing wrong with it (as long than you don't use the non-valid ie's filter crap)
If you take a look here: http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work you can clearly see that pretty much everything is in Working Draft state so isn't really stable
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#25In the real (physical) world (you remember, that infinitely large thing outside of your computer), this is simply called a "mirror".
It's not producing something, it's looking itself in the mirror: attention: vanity is waiting!
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's hardly "built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3" if they're using proprietary -webkit- properties rather than CSS3 properties.
sice CSS3 is still a work in progress browsers implement upcomig features using -webkit/-o/-moz there's nothing wrong with it (as long than you don't use the non-valid ie's filter crap) If you take a look here: http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work you can clearly see that pretty much everything is in Working Draft state so isn't really stable
It may be valid according to the wording, but denying supported features to all but one rendering engine is certainly not compatible with the spirit of any web standard.
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#27Firefox can do that as well: chrome://browser/content/browser.xul Ok... that is cheating...
For anyone intrigued: http://grab.by/4wnv
From about a year ago: http://i.imgur.com/AzdGC.jpg
Yes, this is completely pointless.
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#28Why is this so proud of using HTML5/CSS3 and no images, when the site General Metrics seems to imply that they value Photoshop over non-PS methods. // We help design agencies build websites and web applications. if ( Photoshop > (TextMate || Coda) ) { contactUs (”email”); }
The joke is that (TextMate || Coda) as any OR operation, returns either 0 or 1, so if Photoshop is >=2 then that if condition is always true, regardless of the value of TextMate and Coda.