Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
general-metrics.com
Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
1–10 of 28 posts
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#2Built by Xzibit?
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#3It's neat, but I really expected some kind of iframe, so you could browse inside it.
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#4It would have been nice if they didn't use so many -webkit- properties (I counted 34) so that other browsers could at least have a shot at rendering it. Several properties they use are supported by Opera if given the chance.
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#5It's neat, but I really expected some kind of iframe, so you could browse inside it.
And of course the first page I'd visit with it would be itself. And again. And again.
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#6Why is this so proud of using HTML5/CSS3 and no images, when the site General Metrics seems to imply that they value Photoshop over non-PS methods.
// We help design agencies build websites and web applications.
if ( Photoshop > (TextMate || Coda) ) { contactUs (”email”); }
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#7Why is this so proud of using HTML5/CSS3 and no images, when the site General Metrics seems to imply that they value Photoshop over non-PS methods. // We help design agencies build websites and web applications. if ( Photoshop > (TextMate || Coda) ) { contactUs (”email”); }
I read it as: if you prefer to use photoshop (i.e. you are a graphics designer that wants to just send a mock-up and have it implemented) you should contact them.
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#8Why is this so proud of using HTML5/CSS3 and no images, when the site General Metrics seems to imply that they value Photoshop over non-PS methods. // We help design agencies build websites and web applications. if ( Photoshop > (TextMate || Coda) ) { contactUs (”email”); }
I think it's just their way of saying they're looking to hire a graphic designer as opposed to programmers, not their design philosophy.
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#9Firefox can do that as well:
chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
Ok... that is cheating...
Re: Safari 4, built entirely with valid HTML5 and CSS3. Nary an image was used.
#10the colors of the close, minimize and expand aren't correct, so not entirely accurate. Still awesome