Earlier quoted context omitted.
Particularly in Voyager. They were either running extremely low early in the show or had a virtually infinite supply later in the show. No explanation given. Which is particularly troublesome given the plot of the Equinox episodes. Since on that ship they were harvesting creates to extend their dilithium crystal supply allowing them to travel faster/less efficiently. But even throughout those episodes they never disc…
Voyager spent most of the first season looking for deuterium, so that they could keep the ship moving forward. Presumably, at some point around episode ~15, someone in either engineering, or the writing team realized that it is the third most abundant element in the universe.
Seven earth-sized planets discovered circling a star 39 light years from Earth
361–370 of 754 posts
Re: Seven earth-sized planets discovered circling a star 39 light years from Earth
#362To get a spacecraft there it would take: Accelerating at 1g the 1st half, and decelerating at 1g the 2nd half, the traveler would experience 7.3 years of time. For observers it would take 41.8 years at a max speed of 0.998c If you had a near perfect hydrogen -> helium fusion engine, it'd take about 6 million tons of fuel (about the mass of the Pyramids of Egypt or 2,000 Saturn V rockets)
How much fuel would it take to get 6 million tons of fuel off Earth into the interstellar ship?
Re: Seven earth-sized planets discovered circling a star 39 light years from Earth
#363Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess J.J. Abrams is somewhat forgiven for this, then: http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/startrek/images/2/29/Vul... [edited for direct .jpg]
I always thought that Firefly's scenario of a bunch of Earth-like worlds in close enough proximity to have regular trading ships flying between them was unrealistic. Now, not so much. This system even fits in with the "Abandon Earth en-mass, move to new set of worlds" backstory. So, what did J.J. know, and when did he know it? And for that matter, how did he know?
Also, I'm relatively positive that JJ (in the sci-fi works he actually, well, worked on), himself, knew nothing (see Armageddon for sources) and that his script supervisors dealt with any discrepancies with reality JJ had.
Re: Seven earth-sized planets discovered circling a star 39 light years from Earth
#364Earlier quoted context omitted.
So, basically, this is cooler than just about any world that's been depicted in sci-fi.
I guess J.J. Abrams is somewhat forgiven for this, then: http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/startrek/images/2/29/Vul... [edited for direct .jpg]
Re: Seven earth-sized planets discovered circling a star 39 light years from Earth
#365Re: Seven earth-sized planets discovered circling a star 39 light years from Earth
#366Although, he had no proof for his intuition, so I cannot entirely cherish him as a martyr for modern cosmology.
Re: Seven earth-sized planets discovered circling a star 39 light years from Earth
#367Earlier quoted context omitted.
The engineering issues are really tough, though surmountable. Currently, we just can't engineer the parts that will last that long in hard vacuum. Mostly because we can't test in that environment easily. Also, what do you do when all the light bulbs have burned out or gone haywire, what does that fault-tree look like for the billion and one parts on the craft? For a short journey of ~7 years, it's not a very big deal…
Yeah I'm to be honest just trying to awaken people to the priority being that we need to establish a self-sufficient colony somewhere other than Earth.
Re: Seven earth-sized planets discovered circling a star 39 light years from Earth
#368Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah I'm to be honest just trying to awaken people to the priority being that we need to establish a self-sufficient colony somewhere other than Earth.
Elon Musk is working on that. http://www.spacex.com/mars
Re: Seven earth-sized planets discovered circling a star 39 light years from Earth
#369Earlier quoted context omitted.
That actually sounds... more plausible than I would have expected. Like, doable with technology I can imagine being within reach in the next 50 years even if we don't achieve any currently-unforseen breakthroughs.
Which begs the question, why haven't we at least even tried to have done anything like this already? Do we really need to repeatedly spend comparable amounts of money on yet another dramatic TV special about humans traveling to Mars, as narrated by a favored celebrity? We really are running out of time. And it almost seems like it's pre-determined to happen. :\
Re: Seven earth-sized planets discovered circling a star 39 light years from Earth
#370Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not depressing. It gives us a moral imperative to transplant Earth-origin life onto every somewhat concentrated mass that we can reach. Then we can wait a few billion years, and the universe will likely have generated a superior successor species which can then re-seed over everything we had previously tilled, and then some. And they'll all be rubber-forehead aliens to one another, because they'll be billionth…
> It gives us a moral imperative to transplant Earth-origin life onto every somewhat concentrated mass that we can reach. And in the very likely scenario that we are never able to "reach" outside our solar system... Then what?
We already have the technology to reach outside the solar system. It launched in 1977.
We will have the capability to transplant microorganisms to extrasolar planets long before moving humans that may have 100kg or more to one. Which is good, because it may take a while for the algae to get established anyway. And if for some reason higher species never show up, that celestial object won't have to overcome the steep initial hurdle of abiogenesis.