Live data from Hacker News

Zerocoin implementation bug

zcoin.io

1–10 of 142 posts

Re: Zerocoin implementation bug

#2
What's better that stealing magic Internet money? Creating anonymous magic Internet money out of thin air, then selling it. Brilliant.

But seriously, I'm not sure which is worse: Watching your stolen money move around the blockchain knowing you are helpless to do anything about it, or being provably unable to even tell the difference between "real" and "counterfeit" coins.

Re: Zerocoin implementation bug

#3
>trading will resume once pools and exchanges have had time to update their code. A new release will be pushed out pretty soon.

Does this imply this company has the power to stop all trading on the currency? If so, why would anyone ever want to use this?

Re: Zerocoin implementation bug

#5
post #2

What's better that stealing magic Internet money? Creating anonymous magic Internet money out of thin air, then selling it. Brilliant. But seriously, I'm not sure which is worse: Watching your stolen money move around the blockchain knowing you are helpless to do anything about it, or being provably unable to even tell the difference between "real" and "counterfeit" coins.

Welcome to the world of 2017, where dreams really can come true!

Re: Zerocoin implementation bug

#6
post #3

>trading will resume once pools and exchanges have had time to update their code. A new release will be pushed out pretty soon. Does this imply this company has the power to stop all trading on the currency? If so, why would anyone ever want to use this?

No, it implies they can nicely ask the exchanges to stop all trading, and the exchanges can make that decision or not.

Re: Zerocoin implementation bug

#7
post #3

>trading will resume once pools and exchanges have had time to update their code. A new release will be pushed out pretty soon. Does this imply this company has the power to stop all trading on the currency? If so, why would anyone ever want to use this?

> Prior to this announcement we had disclosed the hack to the exchanges for them to assist in our investigations.

No, but it does sound like they disclosed the vuln to exchanges before announcing so that trading could be halted and patches applied.

Post reply on HN