Untitled topic
1–10 of 60 posts
Re: undefined
#2Re: undefined
#3Regardless of the stance on free speech, pictures of Mohammed are offensive to Muslims.
Given their previous policy, I don't think this is any surprise or should get any analysis beyond the attention paid to prior examples . . .
Re: undefined
#4Facebook is enough of a utility / sticky service that banning free speech that is not clearly against TOS (and this is NOT a hate group!) is unethical.
Re: undefined
#5I can certainly see why they pulled this page.
Re: undefined
#6Re: undefined
#7If it amounts to hate speech it's a violation of their TOS and gets pulled, so I'm curious what was actually being posted in the discourse that warranted this.
Re: undefined
#8If even one person at Facebook was threatened with violence for not taking down the pages, I think that it would be irresponsible and dumb to not meet those demands given the track record of SOME parts of the Muslim religion. The fact is I would be offended if Facebook didn't do this and I was an employee of Facebook.
Re: undefined
#9Re: undefined
#10Facebook has a track-record of pulling racially / religiously offensive pages. They got rid of some Italian Neo-Nazi's a few years back, and some anti-semetic stuff late last year. Regardless of the stance on free speech, pictures of Mohammed are offensive to Muslims. Given their previous policy, I don't think this is any surprise or should get any analysis beyond the attention paid to prior examples . . .
Examples of religion causing meaningful offense: Talk to your local gay marriage activist.