Live data from Hacker News

The Wall Street Journal to Close Google Loophole Entirely

digiday.com

341–345 of 345 posts

Re: The Wall Street Journal to Close Google Loophole Entirely

#341

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bookmarklet for Facebook: javascript:window.location="https://m.facebook.com/l.php?u="+encodeURIComponent(window.location.href); Bookmarklet for Google: javascript:window.location="https://www.google.com/url?rct=j&url="+encodeURIComponent(window.location.href);

This is awesome. Just for folks who aren't clear how to create a bookmarklet: Create a bookmark of any page, by going to a URL such as https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122878081364889613 (note that only the top part of the page loads) and enter Cmd (or Ctrl) D. Now Save the bookmark to your bookmark bar. Find the bookmark, right click, and replace the WSJ URL with the javascript URL in the parent post. Save and now tes…

How does this work, step by step?

Re: The Wall Street Journal to Close Google Loophole Entirely

#342
I have used Oasis ha­cker quite a number o­f times and he has ne­ver disappointed me. ­He does all types of ­mobile hacks; get unr­estricted and unnotic­eable access to your ­partner/spouse/anybod­y's facebook account,­ email, whatsapp, tex­t messages. He also m­ake changes in any da­tabase/website such a­s your college/univer­sity grades. They are­ very reliable contac­t him at dataoasis247@outlook.­com.

Re: The Wall Street Journal to Close Google Loophole Entirely

#343
post #18

https://support.google.com/news/publisher/answer/40543?hl=en... According to this, it will need to mark WSJ links differently in Google News. Interestingly, I tested it and links from Google news still had a "First Click Free", contrary to OP. To test: 1. Go to https://news.google.com/ from a computer that hasn't visited any WSJ articles that day 2. Click on a WSJ link (mine was https://www.wsj.com/articles/daniel-ta…

Update: WSJ articles that are paywalled are now marked as subscription in google news.

Re: The Wall Street Journal to Close Google Loophole Entirely

#344
post #32

First of all, I think it's great that journalists can get compensated for their work. but, strictly speaking as a consumer, I must say their paywall is completely out of touch with the way I want to pay for news consumption. I don't mind paying 5c or even 10c per article, but I'm certainly not going to sign up to pay 120$ for 6 months, if I'm only going to read 1 or 2 articles here and there. but since they've done i…

The amount you want to pay for news is not anywhere close to the value it is providing you or that they make from ad revenue.

Perhaps that's true for the top 10% most engaged WSJ users.

But, how do you know how much value I'm getting from that news source? I usually get my news from many different sources. And sometimes, I don't even read the entire article. Only a small percentage of the articles are actually of interest to me.

Re: The Wall Street Journal to Close Google Loophole Entirely

#345

First of all, I think it's great that journalists can get compensated for their work. but, strictly speaking as a consumer, I must say their paywall is completely out of touch with the way I want to pay for news consumption. I don't mind paying 5c or even 10c per article, but I'm certainly not going to sign up to pay 120$ for 6 months, if I'm only going to read 1 or 2 articles here and there. but since they've done i…

So 15 minutes of entertainment time to you (the time spent consuming a WSJ article) is worth 5 or 10 cents? Imagine if you were compensated at the same rate for your work. I suggest you try to find a substitute for those entertainment pennies. If you can, and that item is "free", good for you. But I doubt 5 or 10 cents gets you much.

I speed read. Usually I'm done in less than 30-60 seconds. There's so much filler stuff in there, often.
Post reply on HN