Earlier quoted context omitted.
Absolutely spot on. How an average user was expected to download an "alternative browser" without having a browser pre-installed was beyond me. The whole "browser choice" prompt was a farce. This is before we get into the part about removing Windows Media Player from some EU releases...
I still have IE "installed" on my computer. I never use it, for reasons stated. Who cares if it is installed? I don't. I did use it to download Chrome, though :-)
Warren Buffett’s Best Investment
191–200 of 212 posts
Re: Warren Buffett’s Best Investment
#192Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Except that all the numbers on his net worth are based just on his word and he's clearly a serial liar. No they're not, the link I provided also showed figures based on Forbes estimate of his net worth. $40,000,000 (Trump's share of his father's fortune) invested in the market in 1974 would be worth $1.22 billion in 2015 (when he announced his campaign). Compared to Forbes estimate of his net worth at $4.5 billion…
> figures based on Forbes estimate of his net worth. You know Forbes is just a business magazine, and just a small one at that? They don't have any privileged information. They probably just based their reporting on his self-reported wealth. At best they could look at the public valuations of some of his properties, but since the Trump organization is privately held they have no way of knowing how badly he's leverage…
I'm simply pointing out observable reality.
'Art of the Deal' may just be a set of strategies for making money in real estate, but those same strategies seem to guide how he sees the world and acts as a person.
I'm not making any judgement about whether that is a good or bad thing, but failing to understand that means failing to understand Trump.
Re: Warren Buffett’s Best Investment
#193Earlier quoted context omitted.
> this issue could be addressed in the ballot box I don't believe that is true. Recent history is especially illustrative of this.
> Recent history is especially illustrative of this. Are you referring to Trump's election? Well, some people's problems were solved by the ballot box, and they got their man elected. The fact that you disagree with the politics doesn't negate the system working as intended.
So there's an example of how, one of the most important issues, has no ability to be addressed in the ballot box in recent history.
Re: Warren Buffett’s Best Investment
#194Earlier quoted context omitted.
> this issue could be addressed in the ballot box I don't believe that is true. Recent history is especially illustrative of this.
More money wouldn't help that cause though. The US doesn't need the billions to solve issues, it already has it. The lack of solutions in the US is due to people not working towards them, not the resources being lacked.
Re: Warren Buffett’s Best Investment
#195Earlier quoted context omitted.
> but he is far from a brilliant businessman. I'm not claiming he is a brilliant businessman. I'm only disputing the assertion that he "lacks intelligence", which is what started this side-thread. > How do you lose a billion dollars? Many different ways. For example, Hillary spent over a billion dollars on her losing campaign, but I don't assume that Hillary lacks intelligence because of this. > Could his relative su…
> Hillary spent Not her personal wealth
Losing a billion dollars is easier than you think, because even if you're intelligent, sometimes circumstances conspire against you.
Re: Warren Buffett’s Best Investment
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
Read my comment.... > civil and human rights abuses
What should they do, exactly? In my eyes improving education and helping the poor aim exactly at the root of your problems.
Re: Warren Buffett’s Best Investment
#197Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Trump lacks intelligence I keep seeing people say this, but I'm not sure it's true. He took a loan of a few million from his father and turned it in to a billion dollar empire. It's difficult to do that without some measure of intelligence. He almost lost that billion dollar empire in '94, but recovered and built it back up again in to a billion dollar empire. It's more difficult to do that without some intelligenc…
> He took a loan of a few million from his father and turned it in to a billion dollar empire. http://fortune.com/2015/08/20/donald-trump-index-funds/ What kind of business genius does it take to lag S&P 500 that badly? If he had done absolutely nothing with his dad's money, except park it in an index fund, he'd be 4 times richer. The article linked also compares the investment performance of Bill Gates and Warren Bu…
Re: Warren Buffett’s Best Investment
#198I appreciate these efforts, but my mind is drawn to a somewhat orthogonal set of tactics. When I see stats like $1 of vaccines releasing $44 of economic value, I think: there is a market opportunity here. The question I keep asking is: what would a hedge fund look like that was making a bet that most people in poverty could produce the $44 if we invested the $1? What kind of corporate structure would be needed to dis…
This kind of thing is quite profitable for the government though, because they get to collect that $44, even if it is diluted.
Re: Warren Buffett’s Best Investment
#199Re: Warren Buffett’s Best Investment
#200I appreciate these efforts, but my mind is drawn to a somewhat orthogonal set of tactics. When I see stats like $1 of vaccines releasing $44 of economic value, I think: there is a market opportunity here. The question I keep asking is: what would a hedge fund look like that was making a bet that most people in poverty could produce the $44 if we invested the $1? What kind of corporate structure would be needed to dis…
It's not like there's a simple way to invest $1 and extract $44. That $44 is diluted in the total GDP. There's also a quite low limit on how many people you can vaccinate, even if you offer it for free. This kind of thing is quite profitable for the government though, because they get to collect that $44, even if it is diluted.
The way I am currently pursuing it is basically to build an agency (like a Hollywood agency) for people in poverty and use automation to get economies of scale so it can survive on many slices of small payouts. It's not simple, but it's the only thing I can think of.
Arguably TaskRabbit and Uber are a version of this, but they target poor working class people, not those in actual poverty.
Would be interested to hear other ideas. I don't expect any of them to be simple.