Save the dog from a 70m deep, 35cm wide hole
31–40 of 63 posts
Re: Save the dog from a 70m deep, 35cm wide hole
#32Argon gas would fit the bill. It's heavier than air, so it would sink to the bottom of the borehole, and it's widely available due to its' use as a shielding gas for welding. Most importantly, it would be humane and entirely painless for the dog-- far more humane than leaving the poor animal down there for days or weeks waiting to be rescued.
Re: Save the dog from a 70m deep, 35cm wide hole
#33Without a remote camera do the same but keep trying until you randomly catch it.
Re: Save the dog from a 70m deep, 35cm wide hole
#34Re: Save the dog from a 70m deep, 35cm wide hole
#35I love dogs, like everyone else, but isn't this all a little bit much? Shouldn't they be considering solutions for humanely euthanizing the dog so it doesn't have to die of thirst/starvation? Argon gas would fit the bill. It's heavier than air, so it would sink to the bottom of the borehole, and it's widely available due to its' use as a shielding gas for welding. Most importantly, it would be humane and entirely pai…
If you think dogs (and other such animals) are edible why would you object to just filling it in with dirt? You'd slit it's throat normally and cut it's flesh off it's body to eat but you won't suffocate it in 60 seconds by burial?
You need to pick a side.
Re: Save the dog from a 70m deep, 35cm wide hole
#36Re: Save the dog from a 70m deep, 35cm wide hole
#37I love dogs, like everyone else, but isn't this all a little bit much? Shouldn't they be considering solutions for humanely euthanizing the dog so it doesn't have to die of thirst/starvation? Argon gas would fit the bill. It's heavier than air, so it would sink to the bottom of the borehole, and it's widely available due to its' use as a shielding gas for welding. Most importantly, it would be humane and entirely pai…
If you want to humanize something most of us eat would you want that done to you? or would you want every effort made? If you think dogs (and other such animals) are edible why would you object to just filling it in with dirt? You'd slit it's throat normally and cut it's flesh off it's body to eat but you won't suffocate it in 60 seconds by burial? You need to pick a side.
Re: Save the dog from a 70m deep, 35cm wide hole
#38Re: Save the dog from a 70m deep, 35cm wide hole
#39Re: Save the dog from a 70m deep, 35cm wide hole
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want to humanize something most of us eat would you want that done to you? or would you want every effort made? If you think dogs (and other such animals) are edible why would you object to just filling it in with dirt? You'd slit it's throat normally and cut it's flesh off it's body to eat but you won't suffocate it in 60 seconds by burial? You need to pick a side.
"most of us" do not in fact eat dogs.
Yes I know Muslims, a big part of the population won't eat dog or pork etc. But not because they are considered purer, but they are considered impure.
Vegetarians/vegan are a minority for now.