Live data from Hacker News

The clock is ticking for Spotify

bbc.co.uk

111–116 of 116 posts

Re: The clock is ticking for Spotify

#111
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am not sure what is ironic about this, unless you mistook electronic music for edm?

Almost all underground electronic labels offer their releases digitally, they just don't publish to steaming services.

And some don't. I'm looking at you SUED or Perlon. And that's totally fine! They sell enough and the dj's and producers are highly praised anyways.

Re: The clock is ticking for Spotify

#112
post #68
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly, if this is how you evaluate music, the current generation of streaming is not for you. Do yourself a favour, buy a good quality turntable and start collecting vinyl!! PS - I've been collecting vinyl for over twenty years and consider it my one serious vice. This comment is the equivalent of a drug addict suggesting that you "just try it once." You've been warned...:)

I own plenty of vinyl, two Technics SL1200's and a mixer and I think it's a huge waste of resources. What I need is to just get lossless music effortlessly and with the right mastering. For new stuff it's pretty easy because you only have one option (or then some mega rare double vinyl versions, I'm looking at you Björk!). But for these old rock albums... In the 2000's their record labels wanted people to buy them ag…

With all due respect, I think you're just looking for something to complain about. Generations of music fans would love to have the options that you clearly have...

Re: The clock is ticking for Spotify

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have absolutely no issues with the mobile or desktop versions of the app.

The mobile app is pretty decent, but it's not well designed. It's easy to get lost in the confusion mishmash of navigation elements. For example, if I'm playing a song, I tend to hit the hamburger menu in the upper-right corner to find the "add to playlist" function, when it's in the tiny "..." icon next to the pause button. I'm reasonably happy with the desktop app, although it's still as terrible at organizing your…

For me the desktop app regularly seems to consume way too much RAM (memory leak?), and it regularly doesn't shut down properly or even crashes, and this is on two separate macs.

Could be that it's a MacOS Sierra issue, but considering the number of 'random weird shit' that happens when I have the app open (playback working fine but visually stuck on an ad, to name a recent issue), I'm inclined to think it's just a piece a shit.

On the one hand I am baffled by the terrible quality, but then I remember that even companies like Google aren't always much better. My Google Inbox app (on iPhone), for example, regularly gets 'stuck' on showing a badge icon of '1' even though I can't for the life of me produce the email that causes this. It's been this way for quite a while and I just don't get how it's possible that a big company like Google lets this happen. And again, I understand it's possible there's some weird edge case that causes this to happen for just me or very few other users, but considering that I run into a whole bunch of other weird issues using Google Inbox, I'm inclined to conclude, once again, that it's just a piece of shit.

Re: The clock is ticking for Spotify

#114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personally, I fell in love in their Discover Weekly algorithm. If you in previous week listened music from artists which tracks haven't been listed in any user-made playlist nor played magical 10,000 times and there is a problem with getting a vinyl / CD you wouldn't expect any songs from such artists but in Discover Weekly you may found similar tracks - they match same genre, they are also from the same decade, they…

Protip: You can generate a new random "Discover Weekly"-style playlist manually by putting a bunch of songs into a playlist, right-clicking the playlist (in the desktop app) and selecting "Create similar playlist".

Oh, thank you so much for that! I find Spotify to be an even bigger turd than iTunes (at least in the ways that matter to me), but I use it for the discovery. This tip is a good addition!

Re: The clock is ticking for Spotify

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I recently switched to SoundCloud free and the ads are really not that bad (only con for example if your playing off your phone and it hits a video ad you can't lock your device till the SD finishes). However if the device screen is locked you'll only get audio ads (short and sweet at that). Like YouTube though it will suffer from take down notices on some stuff you book mark, as well as mainstream stuff you can only…

I use both. Soundcloud audio quality is way lower. Not suitable for all day listening without fatigue.

Very true, that is one thing I find replacing a lot of songs with others to get quality. Which can be frustrating when you don't have spare time at all during the day.

Re: The clock is ticking for Spotify

#116
post #87

Spotify are aggressively exploiting artists and yet they are not making money. Not sustainable, and it's not really suprising. If someone offers you all the music of the world for 10 bucks that is just too good to be true. I closed my Spotify account because I didn't want to be complicit in the exploitation of artists. I'm now using Qobuz ($20/month) and hope that they are paying more fairly (couldn't find any number…

> Spotify are aggressively exploiting artists... What do you mean by that? And separately, is it better or worse or the same as how the music industry has exploited artists over the years?

I'm not defending the music industry. They deserve to die. But, yes, Spotify is worse. At least that's what all musicians I talk to are telling me unison.
Post reply on HN