This one breaks my heart a little.
I mean, I get it, I understand why it's there. But it still breaks my heart.
61–70 of 182 posts
This one breaks my heart a little.
I mean, I get it, I understand why it's there. But it still breaks my heart.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Search for a presentation from Ruxcon 2016, I don't recall the researchers names but they presented attacks on various keyboards including ones with AES support.
That's a talk about wireless keyboards in general, not Bluetooth. There are attacks on Bluetooth keyboards as well, but they're logistically complicated. See 'dguido's comment for more.
Also, why using fingerprint to unlock devices is not recommended?
Step 2: The rest is easy.
Edit: You guys need to get a sense of humor
Great list, I'm glad the crew in the comment threads put it together. 2 observations: * These lists are often made but are never kept up to date as recommendations change. Will this list be any different? * Use Gmail? We can't pick some other web based, 2FA capable non-US hosted service that doesn't specifically use machines to scan your content for ad serves? This recommendation was the only one that furrowed my bro…
My guess is it's because Google's security team is top notch and happy to share their threat intel with their users and that's much more relevant to journalists than using a non-US based service or one that avoids content based ad serving.
It would probably behoove someone to sell these laptops, iPads, and iPhones to journalists, lawyers, and other folks with these configurations. It's a lot easier to give them a pre-configured locked down device that they can't mess with than it is to ask them to actually buy a Yubikey. It won't work for everyone - Slate's CMS is notorious for only working in Firefox, for example - but if Pro Publica is going to hire…
I don't think I'd be able to trust any individual or company selling 'secure devices' for journalists and activists.
Can someone explain the reasoning behind these recommendations? Don't : > Use your fingerprint to lock/unlock devices. > Use an Android phone. > Take the devices you work on across the US border. Anyone has experience with their devices being searched at the border? Do they just look at your social media and let you go or do they somehow copy the data on the devices or install any software on the devices? Will the pe…
thegrugq recently had a post about travel kits https://twitter.com/thegrugq/status/829855684636274688 It's not just the US border, any border they can request you open up social media accounts or walk away with your laptop or phone and return it later filled with spyware. Business trips from here to China always involve buying a new phone and wiping/selling it on Craigslist after you return assuming it's been comprom…
Would be helpful to provide alternative to some of the Don'ts. How does one transfer information if they can't transfer anything across the border? Where should one store sensitive information? An encrypted drive you're not supposed to transfer across the border? I'm not really sure what a person is supposed to do with either of those two recommendations, especially if we're saying that person is not tech-savvy. I th…
I understand Google runs a tight ship security-wise, but what about the unintentional information leakage that occurs because they read all your mail to serve you ads?
Would be helpful to provide alternative to some of the Don'ts. How does one transfer information if they can't transfer anything across the border? Where should one store sensitive information? An encrypted drive you're not supposed to transfer across the border? I'm not really sure what a person is supposed to do with either of those two recommendations, especially if we're saying that person is not tech-savvy. I th…
2. Because Chrome is significantly more secure than Firefox. See: rest of thread.
3. Because no email provider is truly safe, and Google's mail service is better defended than virtually any other mail provider. Things like Protonmail are security gimmicks. If you're concerned enough about messaging safety to use some idiosyncratic email provider, you're concerned enough to stop using email for secrets altogether: use Signal, WhatsApp, or Wire.
4. Because a Chromebook is safer for a typical user than Linux, and also because there's a (remote) chance that people might actually use a Chromebook. The security challenges of 2017 are not an opportunity to finally achieve Linux On The Desktop.
5. The list's most contentious recommendation is a rebuke to Google.
6. Standalone 1Password isn't a cloud-based password manager. People should avoid cloud-based password managers.