Live data from Hacker News

The web sucks if you have a slow connection

danluu.com

541–550 of 622 posts

Re: The web sucks if you have a slow connection

#541

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That only adds about 200-300ms RTT I'd guess. I live in India and use many websites which are hosted in the US, and they work fine.

(Hello from Kenya) There are usually CDN nodes in India. Cloudfront has edge nodes there, google's cdn does. There's also a Mumbai AWS datacentre. When you get far away from the common edges, it gets real noticeable.

~$ ping imgur.com

PING imgur.com (151.101.40.193) 56(84) bytes of data.

64 bytes from 151.101.40.193 (151.101.40.193): icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=342 ms

imgur.com works fine

~$ ping python.org

PING python.org (23.253.135.79) 56(84) bytes of data.

64 bytes from 23.253.135.79 (23.253.135.79): icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=267 ms

python.org works fine

news.ycombinator.com and reddit.com also works fine even though I'm logged in (there's about a 300ms, 700ms delay in the Network tab of Chrome's devtools for news.ycombinator.com and reddit.com)

Re: The web sucks if you have a slow connection

#542

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>If browsers could expose the available bandwidth I don't know why this seems like such an imposition, but I think I'd be uncomfortable with my browser exposing information about my actual network if it didn't have to. I have a feeling way more people would be using this to track me than to considerately send me less data. That said, browser buy-in could be a huge help, if only to add a low-tech button saying, "reque…

Indeed; as an user, I don't want the site to decide what quality to serve me based on probing my device. It'll only lead to the usual abuse. I want to specify I want a "lightweight" version or "full experience" version, and have the page deliver an appropriate one on demand.

I remember when websites used to have "[fast internet]" or "[slow internet]" buttons that you could use to choose if you wanted flash or not. Even though I had a high-speed, I chose slow because the site would load faster.

Re: The web sucks if you have a slow connection

#543
post #499

Earlier quoted context omitted.

According to the article: > To be a true Giffen good, the good's price must be the only thing that changes to produce a change in quantity demanded. A Giffen good should not be confused with products bought as status symbols or for conspicuous consumption (Veblen goods) Veblen goods = Goods for which demand rises with price because they are status symbols Giffen = Goods for which demand rises with price - Veblen Good…

Isn't a Giffen good then just something where one infers quality from price? I've seen that happen many times with my own eyes, so hard to believe they've never been identified. It's possible to price something so cheap, people assume there's a catch.

No. The example of a giffen good given is a high calorie food, that's exceptionally low status. Thus, when its price falls, people will demand less of it, as they can afford to replace some of their consumption of that food with more expensive, better food. Workers replacing some proportion of their bread or potato intake with meat, as the price of that bread or potato intake drops, say.

The idea is that the good is the lowest quality way of fulfilling some need - so people buy it because they can't afford anything else.

Re: The web sucks if you have a slow connection

#544
post #386

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You aren't necessarily, though. Efforts spent optimizing the existing functionality are not being spent adding new features.

But your optimizing things people are using frequently, not adding things they probably aren't. Adding features is usually diminishing returns as well.

Even if you just want to polish or optimize existing functionality, bandwidth usage may not be the biggest bottleneck for all or most users.

Re: The web sucks if you have a slow connection

#545

By far the worst site I regularly use, from a page loading perspective, is my local newspaper. It takes about 10 seconds before it loads to a usable state on a T1 connection. If I pop open an inspector, requests go on for about 30 seconds before they die down. It's about 8MB. http://www.telegraphherald.com/

If you wait 10 seconds to get the news you are more patient than me. I would quickly go elsewhere unless they deliver high quality news.

Most of my news I do get from elsewhere, but it's really the only local news source.

Re: The web sucks if you have a slow connection

#546

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(Hello from Kenya) There are usually CDN nodes in India. Cloudfront has edge nodes there, google's cdn does. There's also a Mumbai AWS datacentre. When you get far away from the common edges, it gets real noticeable.

~$ ping imgur.com PING imgur.com (151.101.40.193) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 151.101.40.193 (151.101.40.193): icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=342 ms imgur.com works fine ~$ ping python.org PING python.org (23.253.135.79) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 23.253.135.79 (23.253.135.79): icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=267 ms python.org works fine news.ycombinator.com and reddit.com also works fine even though I'm logged in (t…

PING imgur.com (151.101.12.193): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 151.101.12.193: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=499.633 ms 64 bytes from 151.101.12.193: icmp_seq=65 ttl=51 time=330.021 ms 64 bytes from 151.101.12.193: icmp_seq=66 ttl=51 time=557.491 ms 64 bytes from 151.101.12.193: icmp_seq=67 ttl=51 time=478.380 ms 64 bytes from 151.101.12.193: icmp_seq=68 ttl=51 time=400.365 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 69

PING python.org (23.253.135.79): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 23.253.135.79: icmp_seq=0 ttl=44 time=615.871 ms 64 bytes from 23.253.135.79: icmp_seq=1 ttl=44 time=539.681 ms

I'm on an island lost in the middle of the Indian Ocean. But ping weren't that different (50 ms more or less) on the continent (I went to RSA and Namibia)

Re: The web sucks if you have a slow connection

#547

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've tried using Google products from Africa (Ethiopia ... last time this January), and generally, it is right out unusable. JS-heavy apps like GMail will never load properly at all. This while the connection in itself is not THAT bad. I use to use a 3G/4G mobile connection and it generally works excellent, with pretty quick load times, for everything else than javascript-heavy web apps. I have a hard time understand…

GMail has a HTML-only version that is much more lightweight and usable on slow / flaky connections. It's worth it to memorize or bookmark the address, in case you ever need it: http://mail.google.com/mail/h/ (on mobile browsers you need to "request desktop version" and then paste the address again, before you can see it)

Thank you for sharing this link. Here is a related HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7513388

My problem with accessing the low-bandwidth Google tools with archaic browsers (http://dplus-browser.sourceforge.net/, etc.) is that Google still requires the high-bandwith login.

Are you aware of any alternative login URLs or authentication mechanisms?

Re: The web sucks if you have a slow connection

#548

I travel fulltime and my primary internet is 4G LTE. But, even though I spend $250 per month on data, I still run out, and end up throttled to 128kbps for the last couple days of the data cycle. The internet is pretty much unusable at that rate. I can leave my email downloading in Thunderbird for a couple of hours and that's usable (gmail, however is not very usable), and I can read Hacker News (but not the articles…

Incidentally, you may find GMail's "basic HTML view" works better when your connection's throttled: https://support.google.com/mail/answer/15049 And as for reddit, their old mobile view is still available at the "i." subdomain - it's so much lighter-weight than the dreadful JS-laden one they introduced a while back, it's the only way to use reddit on mobile IMO: https://i.reddit.com

Any tips on low-bandwidth login pages for GMail?

Sometimes I can't even get to the HTML view because of the login process!

Re: The web sucks if you have a slow connection

#549

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you share the crash report IDs from your Firefox's about:crashes page? Can you share a link to your bank's crashing web page? I'd like to try to reproduce the crash. Thanks!

Sent by mail. Thanks for looking into it!

This crash is Firefox bug 1328861: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1328861

Re: The web sucks if you have a slow connection

#550

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, back when things actually buffered properly on the internet. The way YouTube buffers now: not actually loading more than a few seconds of the video ahead of where I'm watching, even when it KNOWS my internet is spotty, really frustrates me.

This drives me INSANE . I'd rather let it buffer for 10 min, then watch it in 360p because you guys can't figure out your buffering. The same goes for netflix!

They try to match the resolution to your bandwidth. Sometimes that's the right solution, but not always. When the playback stalls right at the big reveal it can be painful, but that doesn't mean I want to watch the minecraft edition of the movie the whole time
Post reply on HN