I've never really posted though, just been a lurker. I hope the Internet Archive archives this in some form.
“We have decided to disable IMDb's message boards”
21–30 of 340 posts
Re: “We have decided to disable IMDb's message boards”
#22Makes sense. I don't see what the big deal is, surprised to see this at the top of the front page? I had to double check I wasn't looking at /new
IMDb is one of the biggest websites in the world, and they're deleting a large percentage of the content on their site. Seems front-page-worthy if only for the scale of the content being lost, whatever your view of the value of that content.
Re: “We have decided to disable IMDb's message boards”
#23I recall occasionally finding some interesting trivia on movies or actors/actresses that I would not have searched out on my own. Some very interesting stories on meeting a star in real life, or having grown up with them when they were a child provided a bit of depth that more cut and dry places like Wikipedia don't include, and places like the tabloids wouldn't find interesting enough to print.
Unfortunately these interesting comments are also hidden in the midst of users asking "who else think X actor looks like Y actor?" and the plethora of happy birthday threads.
I do wonder how many actors actually visit their IMDB comments section.
As far as there only being one post per comment, that can easily be changed by clicking on the "flat" view instead of the "thread" view. I agree that it may not be the best default, but it's at least available.
Re: “We have decided to disable IMDb's message boards”
#24Re: “We have decided to disable IMDb's message boards”
#25Re: “We have decided to disable IMDb's message boards”
#26Re: “We have decided to disable IMDb's message boards”
#27Perhaps I'm oldfashioned but all the discussions that happen on the "social web" are very scattered, volatile and basically instantly forgotten. So I don't really find that a good argument to delete these archives. That they're overal low-quality discussions, that's true, though. I guess it has more to do with "Focus", and that comes before "Nostalgia".
Re: “We have decided to disable IMDb's message boards”
#28Translation: "We thought we would get a community of fans for free. We didn't realize that maintaining a community requires active engagement, setting rules for behavior and enforcing them. We really didn't think anyone would bother being a troll. This is all too expensive to do properly."
To be fair, IMDB have been at this game for a long time, they're not a random startup pivoting after 6 months. They've probably learnt those lessons a long time ago, I guess something has changed of late whereby keeping the forums stopped being worth the effort.
Too many trigger warnings. Instead they should had said to the trolls to move to 4chan and re-implement the whole thing again.
Re: “We have decided to disable IMDb's message boards”
#29Translation: "We thought we would get a community of fans for free. We didn't realize that maintaining a community requires active engagement, setting rules for behavior and enforcing them. We really didn't think anyone would bother being a troll. This is all too expensive to do properly."
Re: “We have decided to disable IMDb's message boards”
#30Unfortunate, but not too surprising. I recall occasionally finding some interesting trivia on movies or actors/actresses that I would not have searched out on my own. Some very interesting stories on meeting a star in real life, or having grown up with them when they were a child provided a bit of depth that more cut and dry places like Wikipedia don't include, and places like the tabloids wouldn't find interesting e…
If their forums was moderated properly, that comment section could have been an enormous help to their agents.