41–50 of 69 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting. I searched Google Photos for 'dog', and out of 5 results, one is my SO and I, and two are photos of my cats.
do you use google photos and/or drive regularly? Just curious if it is a training data set problem for "me"
It doesn't find anything for "me". I don't know what this classification is based on.
Google photos does this. I just opened Google photos and searched for "food" and aside from a couple pictures of some jack o lanterns (which are arguable, but I don't know anybody who eats theirs on Nov 1st), the results were spot on. "Unlocks" might not be the right word here.
If I search Google Photos for 'dog', the top seven hits are, in order: a fuzzy toy, a possum, another picture of the same possum, a cat, a pair of goats, a sheep, and I think it's a pheasant. The dog is #8. Of course, if I search Google Photos for 'me', the top hit is a frog, so maybe it just hates me. Update : not any more! Now the frog is #2. The top hit if I search for 'me' is the MV Isle of Lewis car ferry, photo…
Recently on my phone I tried to copy and paste a picture from Facebook to my messaging app. Instead of copying the picture, it copied a text message that read "picture of dog and three people." I'm sure this is nothing new, but I'd never seen it before and thought it was interesting.
This reminds me, (very unrelated) a few years ago (almost 10), when I dragged and dropped an image from Wikipedia with Google Chrome to my Windows XP desktop, and to my surprise it actually saved it with a file name that is the description of the picture, not some arbitrarily chosen name or the Wikipedia file name. Sometimes it was really long and descriptive, like "A man wearing red and a woman wearing blue are play…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If I search Google Photos for 'dog', the top seven hits are, in order: a fuzzy toy, a possum, another picture of the same possum, a cat, a pair of goats, a sheep, and I think it's a pheasant. The dog is #8. Of course, if I search Google Photos for 'me', the top hit is a frog, so maybe it just hates me. Update : not any more! Now the frog is #2. The top hit if I search for 'me' is the MV Isle of Lewis car ferry, photo…
my mistake
Seriously, a 51.6MB "gif" that doesn't really add anything to the article?
Really off-topic, but: Are there (tech) news-sites which do not have this 10-100MB bloat with three js framweorks and gifs, ads and whatnot? I'd gladly pay for a minimalist news source...
Seriously, a 51.6MB "gif" that doesn't really add anything to the article?
Really off-topic, but: Are there (tech) news-sites which do not have this 10-100MB bloat with three js framweorks and gifs, ads and whatnot? I'd gladly pay for a minimalist news source...
The HackerNews comment section, with the added benefit of it being more informative.
Google photos does this. I just opened Google photos and searched for "food" and aside from a couple pictures of some jack o lanterns (which are arguable, but I don't know anybody who eats theirs on Nov 1st), the results were spot on. "Unlocks" might not be the right word here.
Apple Photos does this through your phone, or your laptop. (Data from these two are not synced???)
Recently on my phone I tried to copy and paste a picture from Facebook to my messaging app. Instead of copying the picture, it copied a text message that read "picture of dog and three people." I'm sure this is nothing new, but I'd never seen it before and thought it was interesting.
This reminds me, (very unrelated) a few years ago (almost 10), when I dragged and dropped an image from Wikipedia with Google Chrome to my Windows XP desktop, and to my surprise it actually saved it with a file name that is the description of the picture, not some arbitrarily chosen name or the Wikipedia file name. Sometimes it was really long and descriptive, like "A man wearing red and a woman wearing blue are play…