Earlier quoted context omitted.
If he disagrees with the President, why should he (and why should anyone want him to) stop speaking into the President's ear?
Collaborating with the administration legitimizes and normalizes their policies of hate. This does far more damage than any marginal benefit from "speaking into the president's ear". I'm sure it's good for Uber to be on Trump's team, but don't pretend you're "standing up for what's right".
Lyft surges to the top 10 on App Store following the “DeleteUber” campaign
121–130 of 573 posts
Re: Lyft surges to the top 10 on App Store following the “DeleteUber” campaign
#122Re: Lyft surges to the top 10 on App Store following the “DeleteUber” campaign
#123Dan Primack summarised this well; Uber failed on messaging: "Uber has done a lot of questionable things over the years, but its actions this past weekend vis-a-vis Trump's immigration ban weren't among them. An actual timeline from Saturday, which may differ from what you saw on social media: • 4:20pm ET: CEO Travis Kalanick sent email to employees. It stopped short of explicitly opposing the ban, but did say: (1) Th…
Not sure why techcrunch doesn't mention that this may have NOTHING to do with the #deleteuber campaign.
[1] https://techcrunch.com/2017/01/25/lyft-expands-to-40-new-u-s...
Re: Lyft surges to the top 10 on App Store following the “DeleteUber” campaign
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think the pricing is the extent of people's concerns, or even the majority. I'm not a fan of Kalanick, personally, but I was prepared to have been wrong about him when I saw his Facebook post about taking care of the drivers who were stranded by this idiocy. Then, I saw they were taking fares to JFK during the taxi strike — effectively breaking it. To my eyes, and those of many others, that is an ugly repudia…
Instead of a gesture, Uber chose to allow immigrants from the countries in question to keep earning money. Uber made it easy for protesters to get around the police blockade of the AirTrain. There were no ideal options on the table. Joining the strike would have meant hurting a sizable number of immigrants and hurting the protests.
Re: Lyft surges to the top 10 on App Store following the “DeleteUber” campaign
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
The strike was nonsense anyway. Why were drivers striking -- punishing the innocent residents and visitors (and protestors/allies!) of New York (a sanctuary city!), in an attempt to punish Donald Trump?
Virtue signalling
Re: Lyft surges to the top 10 on App Store following the “DeleteUber” campaign
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
Breaking the strike was picking up someone at JFK during the strike. Uber and Lyft both picked up riders during the strike. It's not complicated. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/dr-gridlock/wp/2017/01/2...
Workers choosing not to work is a strike. Infrastructure owners choosing not to let workers work is something else.
Re: Lyft surges to the top 10 on App Store following the “DeleteUber” campaign
#127An Uber or Lyft driver is poor than me and I do not want him to earn less because I want to engage in virtue signaling. I would suggest putting up donation boxes and raising more money to donate it to ACLU and other organizations instead of disrupting normal life.
Re: Lyft surges to the top 10 on App Store following the “DeleteUber” campaign
#128It's funny to me how Lyft positions itself like the poor little underdog that deeply cares about humans. People are so susceptible to marketing it's crazy. They provide the exact same service, and Lyft cloned most of uber's features once uber had achieved the unbelievable mindshift of changing people's behavior. Whatever people think, in a few years if Lyft is popular enough, guess what: they too will become the "big…
Lol, a $5.5B company not "big evil capitalistic enterprise" for you?
Re: Lyft surges to the top 10 on App Store following the “DeleteUber” campaign
#129Dan Primack summarised this well; Uber failed on messaging: "Uber has done a lot of questionable things over the years, but its actions this past weekend vis-a-vis Trump's immigration ban weren't among them. An actual timeline from Saturday, which may differ from what you saw on social media: • 4:20pm ET: CEO Travis Kalanick sent email to employees. It stopped short of explicitly opposing the ban, but did say: (1) Th…
If we stop thinking of it as deleting Uber and start thinking of it as install lyft, I think it makes more sense. Lyft took a very public opposition stance and committed to give 1 000 000$ to support an advocacy group. And this isn't necessarily a stance against Trump, but just this particular executive order.