Live data from Hacker News

Oracle’s Cloud Licensing Change

oracle-base.com

51–60 of 241 posts

Re: Oracle’s Cloud Licensing Change

#51
post #19

Oracle is making a big push to move customers from aws and azure to their own cloud hosting. https://www.oracle.com/corporate/pressrelease/global-region-... Raising prices for hosting with the competitor makes perfect sense when viewed from that angle.

True but if they raise prices too much people will dumb.

How many Oracle ERP users have made the move to the cloud? Very few.

Re: Oracle’s Cloud Licensing Change

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Engineers need to learn how to stand their ground

In an Enterprise, you almost never buy 'a database'. There's a solution/application that you buy, that will have a supported DB backed (usually Oracle or MSSQL). That solution is mostly picked on business capabilities and functionality. The technical component is only one aspect of the requirements, which cover business capabilities/features, technical fit within existing environment, data migration/compatibility, ve…

"That solution is mostly picked on business capabilities and functionality."

Exactly - cost of support/hosting/licensing the relevant database is a factor but, in my experience, it is a pretty small part of a large ERP or CRM implementation.

Re: Oracle’s Cloud Licensing Change

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Engineers need to learn how to stand their ground

That's cute. And it might even work in a startup. But likely not. But in the enterprise world nobody really cares what engineers think. You have Enterprise Architects, Technical Architects, Solution Architects etc. who get paid exorbitant amounts of money, are political animals and can masterfully straddle the line between business and technology. Most of them are ex-engineers so they aren't entirely useless and sinc…

"explain what business capabilities it aligns to"

Well, that is rather the point of buying a large complex business application - it has to align with business processes!!

Re: Oracle’s Cloud Licensing Change

#55
post #13

How much longer do you all think Oracle will be around as a company? They burned all bridges with engineers long ago, and they're not going to be able to keep selling their blatant and expensive lock-in strategy to management. Maybe when they finally do go under Google will be able to buy Java and MySQL...

                  |  2012 |  2013 |  2014 |  2015 |  2016 |
    -------------------------------------------------------
    Gross Income  | 26.83B| 27.68B| 28.74B| 28.55B| 27.93B|

Re: Oracle’s Cloud Licensing Change

#56
post #3

Is support the only reason people choose Oracle databases over something free like MySQL or Postgres?

Oracle is much better at handling huge amounts of data. Oracle also has support for all kinds of really niche features that are really important to some people.

Re: Oracle’s Cloud Licensing Change

#57
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's cute. And it might even work in a startup. But likely not. But in the enterprise world nobody really cares what engineers think. You have Enterprise Architects, Technical Architects, Solution Architects etc. who get paid exorbitant amounts of money, are political animals and can masterfully straddle the line between business and technology. Most of them are ex-engineers so they aren't entirely useless and sinc…

I can confirm this. Oracle goes out of their way to make senior and upper-mid management feel like rockstars. All expenses paid meetings in attractive overseas destinations, start to finish hand holding on multi-million dollar engagements, regular contact and personal attention. Management swoon and sign the cheques. And why wouldn't they? After all, it's only the company's money, not theirs personally.

It will be fun if Oracle is investigated relating this practices

Re: Oracle’s Cloud Licensing Change

#58
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

MySQL support you can get from Oracle. PostgreSQL support is very limited. There is no vendor so you're relying on third parties many of whom are mom and pop shops. And if you're a global, multi-national well good luck finding someone who you can cut a deal with for global support. Not to mention that the support is hardly likely to be top tier.

You say this garbage every time this comes up. "Mom and pop shops". Yes, those exist, but they're the minority. You're generally either dealing with EnterpriseDB, or you're dealing with a company that is run by people who are significant contributors to the project — literally, on the core committee — or have people who have created meaningful parts of the PostgreSQL ecosystem. You need to drop this FUD. I will never…

In discussions like this, I often hear people say companies choose Oracle because they'd have "someone to sue" if things go wrong.

Did your employer attempt to recover the money from Oracle? If not, did they even consider doing so?

Re: Oracle’s Cloud Licensing Change

#59
post #3

Is support the only reason people choose Oracle databases over something free like MySQL or Postgres?

Main reason that I have seen for Oracle is that businesses buy applications and then install the database they need to run that application. How many ERP/CRM/HR/financials applications are there that compete with Oracle applications that run on MySQL or Postgres?

Re: Oracle’s Cloud Licensing Change

#60
Oracle is worth every penny that they charge. Unless you've worked with it, you won't understand the love / hate relationship toward it.

Yes. It costs money. Why? Because it does so many things that nothing else comes close to. Its query optimizer is insane. MySQL is a toy and PostgreSQL, while admirable, remains in a lower class.

I say this as a supporter and contributor to open source databases. Like the open source cars of tomorrow; you can't compare them to the pedigree of a Porsche.

I was always a Sybase and DB/2 guy myself, but Oracle could do things. Things Sybase couldn't be tuned for. You don't put Wordpress on Oracle. You do crazy insane shit on it that will break MySQL.

Post reply on HN