First they came for the Iranians

So no, I can't switch to your side because you literally don't have one. A side would be defined as people who think/believe as you do and nobody from the alt-right agrees. You all hate different people for different reasons. Watching your politics is hilarious because you're all each other's normal greatest enemies - religious conservatives with racists with UFO cultists, etc. You're only united by your common hatred of successful happy people.

You think the Trumps of the world are your savior and instead they're the greatest predator of fools like you. The religious right aren't going to get an effective block of abortion, because Trump doesn't care. The bigots aren't going to actually get racial purity because the banning immigration thing is just about appearing tough. Business-first people aren't going to get fiscal policy because Trump's an idiot whose sole trick is reneging on contracts. You won't even have a military in a few years because it has to be paid for. Good luck with your borders then, but it'll be Russia calling.

The rich and successful can leave, you're going to be mired in whatever nonsense you vote for and quickly at each other's throats over it. Any rich and successful jews left Germany long before it fell, but millions of "good germans" were killed in what should have been so easy for an actual master race. losers.

> I think you don't understand how not merely democracy, not merely human society, but the whole game theory works.

And yet you just declared your intent to be non-democratic. To deny some people rights that your ancestors enjoyed. That's why we aren't going to ask - we don't intend to sink to your illegal/unconstitutional depths.

> Yes you're going to eventually hold a referendum about CERN if it will continously raise worries

Worries among reasonable people, sure. But not intentional ignorance. And how would you even know if we turned it off. It's a complex machine and you're race-baiting idiots. The results are published in the type of books without pictures.

> you don't get to "discount" anything.

We were trying not to. Diversity even included those such as yourself and people cared to try to understand what made you tick despite it being irrational and hateful.

We don't have to discount you though, you try getting a hundred people from your side to work together on something other than tearing things apart. I dare you. You couldn't produce anything worth counting. You're breakers, not makers. Takers, not workers.

The only reason you have a voice is that things larger than you stopped to ask your opinion. It was odious and we won't make that mistake again.

1. It's not a draft, it's an issued order.

2. People did start protesting immediately.

> It's limited to seven countries.

Well, the initial 90-day ban in the order is. The order itself is much broader.

> The ban on entry from these countries is 30 days

90 days.

30 days is the timeline for the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security to decide on information that countries (not limited to those covered by the 90-day ban) must provide in the future in order for immigration to be allowed from their country.

> 3) After that point all countries on that list need to provide additional screening info in order for visas to be accepted.

No, all countries period must provide the additional information once it is determined what that information is, within 60 days of the rules being issued. A list of countries (again, not limited to those in the 90-day ban) will be maintained, and entry from those countries will be banned; the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security are to recommend countries based on non-compliance, but the order neither indicates that non-compliance will consistently result in inclusion on the banned list, or that the list will be restricted to non-compliant countries.