11–20 of 160 posts
This is great Twitter is being open about these. Do these releases get media coverage? Is anyone talking about the various lawsuits and blog posts about public releases of NSLs by tech companies? I wish the NYTimes and WaPo spent as much time caring about this stuff as they did about being the non-critical mouthpiece for various "anonymous intelligence officials". There is definitely a story that could be made out of…
Is this the same Twitter that has allegedly shadowbanned Scott Adams multiple times for his political positions? If Twitter is interested in transparency, how about some transparency on that? Twitter's actions make me distrust any "transparency" talk, even if I disagree with Adams on certain things.
Is this the same Twitter that has allegedly shadowbanned Scott Adams multiple times for his political positions? If Twitter is interested in transparency, how about some transparency on that? Twitter's actions make me distrust any "transparency" talk, even if I disagree with Adams on certain things.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They stick to plain ASCII and the same font everywhere to reduce metadata leakage.
> They stick to plain ASCII and the same font everywhere to reduce metadata leakage. Could you please elaborate?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They stick to plain ASCII and the same font everywhere to reduce metadata leakage.
> They stick to plain ASCII and the same font everywhere to reduce metadata leakage. Could you please elaborate?
It's important to remember that these orders serve a real and necessary role in investigating serious criminals; these individuals are not named prior to trial or if the investigation does not lead to a trial. It should not be assumed that they were being unlawfully persecuted - rather that there was a serious reason for them to be under investigation.
If only there were some way of determining whether they were being unlawfully persecuted or validly investigated.