61–70 of 72 posts
There's an amusing number of simple grammatical mistakes in this article.. ("english", "It is unnecessary words that don’t add meaning but complex sentence constructions.", "Write about “grass” except when (my insert) it has another color than green", "Avoid semicolons except when (my insert) you want the reader to make a pause", ...)
I was so disappointed with this book. Some of the platitudes Zinsser goes into are reasonable, like try to be uncluttered, direct and to the point, but all the worked examples seem to just be arbitrarily chosen to his taste. For example, in the chapter on "clutter", Zinsser picks out this passage from Walden as his exemplar of "uncluttered English": "I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front…
I enjoyed (the first 2/3 of) Steven Pinker's The Sense of Style. It includes examples of where prescriptivism fails and succeeds.
Personally, I prefer Strunk and White and the AP Style Guide.
But I was looking for good guides for technical documentation, web copy, and B2B high tech marketing material (case studies, data sheets, etc.).
Not how to write a non-fiction book.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
"I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived." Dense, incredibly difficult to parse, with a non-standard use of "front" as a verb and what seems to be a triple-negative. If I said that sentence to you, out loud, I doubt you would catch the meaning of i…
I completely agree. As another native English speaker I find the highlighted passage parses incredibly naturally. It feels like a single cohesive thought without the need for back-referencing despite encompassing several 'ideas'.
For more modern English, I think George Orwell is very hard to beat.
For blog posts, Paul Graham is always worth reading - not so much for the content, which is often debatable, but for the style, which is reliably lucid.
But it's always a good idea to match the social register and jargon level of the target audience. Professional writers often work on a range of gigs and know how to mould English into a range of styles and voices to reach different audiences.
So I'd be skeptical of any suggestion there's a One True Style for online content or technical writing. There are certainly common standards and traditions, but they may be out of date or too company-specific to apply generally.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The IBM book "Developing Quality Technical Information" is the best I've read on technical writing. For writing style, pickup any novel by Hemingway and copy it. You can also Google "how to write like Hemingway" for some easy to follow basic rules. IMO, however, the biggest problem with most technical writing is not its style but rather the almost complete ignorance of what it should contain and how it should be stru…
Can you recommend some hemingway books?
I was so disappointed with this book. Some of the platitudes Zinsser goes into are reasonable, like try to be uncluttered, direct and to the point, but all the worked examples seem to just be arbitrarily chosen to his taste. For example, in the chapter on "clutter", Zinsser picks out this passage from Walden as his exemplar of "uncluttered English": "I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front…
It's well worth reading that book, but it can be a bit repetitive. There's a chapter in Steven Pinker's The Sense of Style that explains classic style more concisely, and also has excellent advice about writing clearly and coherently founded on a more scientific understanding of how grammar and language cognition actually works.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see anything wrong with the sentence besides maybe the use of "front" that you pointed out. I got it easily the first time reading it and I'm certain it would be just as clear to me spoken as long as I was paying attention.
I remember this story and the only (personal preference) issue I can take with it were the comma placements. Yikes. Shatner anyone?
In the nineteenth century, they were commonly used to indicate prosody — breathing pauses and the intended rhythm of the sentence — which leads to comma placements that seem odd to modern eyes but would have been perfectly normal to a nineteenth-century reader. If you read any Jane Austen, George Eliot, or other Victorian writers, you'll see that sort of usage everywhere:
> "It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife."
I was so disappointed with this book. Some of the platitudes Zinsser goes into are reasonable, like try to be uncluttered, direct and to the point, but all the worked examples seem to just be arbitrarily chosen to his taste. For example, in the chapter on "clutter", Zinsser picks out this passage from Walden as his exemplar of "uncluttered English": "I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front…
I'm sure you've seen it before, but The Economist's style guide is my usual resource: http://www.economist.com/styleguide/introduction
"The US, a large north-american country,...".