Live data from Hacker News

Wine 2.0 released

winehq.org

161–170 of 314 posts

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#161
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I havent used office in a many years now.. but I thought MS Office is now an online offering similar to Google Docs?

Office 360. I dont use it myself but I heard its not comparable and does not work without Internet Explorer...

365, not 360. Also, the online features aren't the main selling point of Office 365, it's still predominantly a suite of desktop apps.

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#162
post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "It's saved me from having to install complex or insecure VMs..." Can you elaborate on this? My intuition is that running an application in a VM provides more security than in wine.

The Linux root is more insulated if your application is in a VM, but running other Windows services broadens the attack surface.

Any problems running Linux in a VM then Wine within that?

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

you're falling for MS's marketing gimmick: "let's put the year in the product name so it will slowly shame and pressure people to give us more money for next years version (whose killer feature is a new splash screen with a year that is closer to now).

You do realise 'let's put the year in the product name' is not MS' current strategy with Office though right? Office 365 is what is promoted most heavily now, for both business and home users.

But that falls out of the pattern as one can subscribe to it?

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#164
I have been wondering something for a long time. Why do some programs work better on specific versions of wine? I think that's what makes me feel iffy about the entire project. I know it's amazing work but I just don't get why that would happen.

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#165

I have been wondering something for a long time. Why do some programs work better on specific versions of wine? I think that's what makes me feel iffy about the entire project. I know it's amazing work but I just don't get why that would happen.

We're rewriting an entire operating system. We have a pretty amazing regression test suite, but it's simply impossible to test everything all the time. Sometimes a change breaks something and it slips through the tests. If you find something that used to work and no longer does, please file a bug. We take regressions seriously; we even have a page dedicated specifically to tracking them: http://source.winehq.org/regressions

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#166

A few years ago I was working on ReactOS and I found a bug in the list view control. After working hard on a patch, I submitted it and heard nothing about it. Have community relations improved since then?

I'm sorry to hear that. In order to avoid regressions, we have pretty rigorous requirements for patch submissions. Unfortunately this can result in dropped patches, especially in subsystems that no one in particular feels responsible for. We are trying to improve this, and we now ship a MAINTAINERS file that will hopefully help with this, and are also actively spreading patch review responsibilities around. I don't think we're significantly worse than most OSS projects, but that doesn't mean we can't improve.

In terms of getting a patch accepted, your best move is to include tests that prove your change is correct. Explaining how your change fixes an application will also help.

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#167
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was considering of using it also. How good is it ? Are there any differences, restrictions ? Currently I use the 1password web version.

It's a bit of a slog: (1) You have to get Wine working, which can be kind of a hassle - there are a million different guides and ways to configure Wine especially wnen you factor in 32-bit versus 64-bit, winetricks, staging versus devel, etc. It's hard to sort through all the potential ways and figure out the simplest thing to do, which is basically: $ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:wine/wine-builds $ sudo apt-get insta…

hmm interesting. I never had to do any of Wine configuration on Ubuntu or Fedora.

1. sudo apt-get install wine 2. wine ~/Downloads/1passwod-blah.exec

On first launch wine configures itself and default configuration IMO works fine for running 1Password.

Last piece of puzzle is, making sure Password agent starts automatically when you login to dekstop so I have little .desktop file in ~/.config/autostart - https://gist.github.com/gnufied/c0615a8a90d21a8d575590b5001f...

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#169
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Old games for instance :) I love this game from the late 90s called Thief: the dark project from Looking Glass Studios. I don't think there is any way to run it properly on a modern computer without wine or virtualization (which would require a copy of Windows 98).

You can. At some point someone (probably one of the original devs) released anonymously a vastly updated version of the Dark Engine that Thief (and Thief 2 and System Shock 2) used that not only fixed any issues of the original but added several QoL improvements like antialiasing, raw mouse input, widescreen support, etc and since then he makes sporadic updates. Look for NewDark. Sadly AFAIK he's still doing that ano…

I remember when the first NewDark patch dropped - the collective response of the community was "What the *?" (in the best way).

Re: Wine 2.0 released

#170

Cool. I have to admit I haven't thought about Wine in a while because I can't think of any software I use that doesn't have a Linux version. What are people's use-cases nowadays?

Gaming is a big one too, but maybe less so now than in the past.

Honestly since Steam came over I haven't really had an issue gaming. Though I'm pretty much exclusively an RTS player, and I know those are easier to port; FPS/action gamers may have different needs from mine.
Post reply on HN