11–20 of 169 posts
I don't understand the down votes since it's factual that you can't sign your plugins and distribute them inside Safari (AND ALSO keep them automatically updated) unless you pay Apple their anual fee. But well, fanboys will be fanboys.
I don't understand the down votes since it's factual that you can't sign your plugins and distribute them inside Safari (AND ALSO keep them automatically updated) unless you pay Apple their anual fee. But well, fanboys will be fanboys.
I don't know why your original comment was downvoted, but dismissing people who disagree with you as "fanboys" is rather insulting.
aside from the information: This website is sooo rediculously hard to browse on my smartphone (Nexus). The arrows are the only thing working to expand the information and they are really hard to open and close (with strange go backwards behaviour). Really bad website UX Apple.
It's not meant for mobile use any more than a Javadoc webpage is. It's a developer resource to consult while coding on your laptop.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know why your original comment was downvoted, but dismissing people who disagree with you as "fanboys" is rather insulting.
Can you provide any other logical explanation to down vote a factual comment completely related to the post?
Also, haven't most of these features already been available in the tech preview? https://developer.apple.com/safari/technology-preview/
still no WebRTC?
Safari is a great browser for MacOS, what it lacks right now, is not more features, is opening the extension system. Let's face it, it is ridiculous to have to pay 100$ a year to be able to improve Apple's product in exchange for nothing. Making plugins for a browser doesn't have in any way the same opportunities to make money from it as making apps for iOS or for MacOS. Still Apple, in all their usual stubbornness r…
Without that you cannot name or provide an extension for files that are triggered for download.
Safari is a great browser for MacOS, what it lacks right now, is not more features, is opening the extension system. Let's face it, it is ridiculous to have to pay 100$ a year to be able to improve Apple's product in exchange for nothing. Making plugins for a browser doesn't have in any way the same opportunities to make money from it as making apps for iOS or for MacOS. Still Apple, in all their usual stubbornness r…