31–40 of 50 posts
For prior art of using :// in branding, here's the IT consulting company I used to run in the early 2000's: https://www.sunesis.com.au/ They haven't changed their website since I sold out in 2003, quite an astonishing thing for a website. You can see, though, that the graphic designer got a bit confused and reversed the order to //:. He insisted on leaving it that way because design reasons.
This is such a non issue that it didn't even warrant the blog post.
For prior art of using :// in branding, here's the IT consulting company I used to run in the early 2000's: https://www.sunesis.com.au/ They haven't changed their website since I sold out in 2003, quite an astonishing thing for a website. You can see, though, that the graphic designer got a bit confused and reversed the order to //:. He insisted on leaving it that way because design reasons.
:/
This is such a non issue that it didn't even warrant the blog post.
I wasn't even aware that curl had a logo.
BTW, Mozilla's logo is a bit smarter, by using the colon instead of an "i" and the slashes instead of two "l"s. In hindsight, they picked the right name in 1998 for this logo.
For prior art of using :// in branding, here's the IT consulting company I used to run in the early 2000's: https://www.sunesis.com.au/ They haven't changed their website since I sold out in 2003, quite an astonishing thing for a website. You can see, though, that the graphic designer got a bit confused and reversed the order to //:. He insisted on leaving it that way because design reasons.
This is such a non issue that it didn't even warrant the blog post.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> how this could lead to possible confusion I sincerely doubt it. There are two groups in the world: Group A: What the hell is a Mozilla? Group B: knows the difference between cURL and Mozilla
But what about the third who may see a cURL logo after the new Mozilla logo and say, "oh, I didn't realize cURL was a Mozilla project."