191–200 of 366 posts
hey, just a thought, but at some point if this gets too popular you will probably get a message from the UK TV company SKY who wont be super happy about your name.
Or the favicon that looks like it was lifted straight from on old version of their website.
What is the business model ?
Hi, Love the site especially the speed. But disappointed that the search indexes the name of the container of the torrent only and not the name of the files within the torrent. To date the only site I know that does this is "filelisting dot com" but their website is very slow. Do you have any plans to extend your product to add this feature. Maybe as a premium option? Super useful to find single documents contained w…
Archived bundles of files having significant names are important! Torrents of opaque disk images and archives (e.g. pirated software) or video files (e.g. pirated movies and TV series episodes) might be popular, but the strong suit of BitTorrent are carefully crafted and often very large collections of books, music, emulator ROM files etc.
Hi, Love the site especially the speed. But disappointed that the search indexes the name of the container of the torrent only and not the name of the files within the torrent. To date the only site I know that does this is "filelisting dot com" but their website is very slow. Do you have any plans to extend your product to add this feature. Maybe as a premium option? Super useful to find single documents contained w…
If 3 more users vote this feature, It will be provided for free to everyone and it will provided at the same speeds as the current website.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Given the relatively slim page size (23Kb for me), and given that SQLite can pretty easily host a relatively simple database like this one and serve 100K-1M queries per day[0], I would expect that whoever is hosting this could pretty easily host this on a single dedicated server which only costs ~$50. So for the foreseeable future, I suspect this site will be fine. [0] - https://sqlite.org/whentouse.html
The cost of hosting will probably be insignificant compared to the cost of dealing with DMCA takedowns and possibly lawsuits.
Aside: the MPAA can do this, of course, because they give lots of money to politicians. If Trump really wants to "drain the swamp" he could be more pro-freedom on file sharing and copyright. Many Trump supporters feel Holywood supports the Democrats, so it's not like he will lose much support over this. A Republican staffer suggested something similar a while ago ( https://politics.slashdot.org/story/12/11/16/2354259/gop-bri... ) but was shot down.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The site serves no JS. Of course you shouldn't trust the site, so you should disable JS explicitly (via NoScript or other means) too.
In that case a clickable maybe link isn't trackable. Afaik that requires js
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe not in itself, but "user mouse pointer is above the url" and "user right clicked" are.
It is trackable in itself through the `copy` clipboard event ( https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Events/copy ). Both keychord and contextual menu will trigger the event.
I don't think that one is.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Selecting and copying are both definitely trackable.
Is "right click and copy url" trackable as well? Genuine question.
If in doubt: If it happens over or in a browser window, it is probably trackable from JavaScript.
See: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Events/copy