Live data from Hacker News

International Entrepreneur Rule

federalregister.gov

21–30 of 121 posts

Re: International Entrepreneur Rule

#21
post #2

Reading through it. The gist is you can get 30 months of parole from USCIS if you are a startup entrepreneur that has raised investment. Seems like the threshold is $250k and it can support up to 3 founders. You must own at least 10% to be considered a founder. Looks like you can also get an additional 30 months by raising a further $500k, or having at least $500k ARR with 20% annual growth, or employing 5 US persons…

A similar scheme works for Canadian immigration.

Re: International Entrepreneur Rule

#23
post #2

Reading through it. The gist is you can get 30 months of parole from USCIS if you are a startup entrepreneur that has raised investment. Seems like the threshold is $250k and it can support up to 3 founders. You must own at least 10% to be considered a founder. Looks like you can also get an additional 30 months by raising a further $500k, or having at least $500k ARR with 20% annual growth, or employing 5 US persons…

The threshold feels low, especially when compared the the new H1B threshold at 100K. As mentioned earlier, this could be easily gamed.

Re: International Entrepreneur Rule

#24
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is that a problem? Why would we not want more rich people becoming citizens and paying US taxes on their worldwide income?

Of course we would want that, but that's not what we get. The rich pay few taxes and the international rich pay even less, given they already have offshore tax havens by the nature of being from another country. Given a green card allows establishment of US companies which are exempt from some tariffs which are imposed on foreign companies, there's no reason to believe that giving the rich green cards will be a net g…

> The rich pay few taxes and the international rich pay even less

The rich pay almost all tax.

Re: International Entrepreneur Rule

#25
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is that a problem? Why would we not want more rich people becoming citizens and paying US taxes on their worldwide income?

Of course we would want that, but that's not what we get. The rich pay few taxes and the international rich pay even less, given they already have offshore tax havens by the nature of being from another country. Given a green card allows establishment of US companies which are exempt from some tariffs which are imposed on foreign companies, there's no reason to believe that giving the rich green cards will be a net g…

The rich don't pay fewer taxes in absolute terms.

They may pay a lower percentage of taxes on wealth gains than middle class or upper middle class, due to being able to delay income realization, lower capital gains taxes, and other means that are more accessible to the rich than the middle class or the poor.

But rich people still tend to pay more taxes than less rich people.

Re: International Entrepreneur Rule

#26
post #2

Reading through it. The gist is you can get 30 months of parole from USCIS if you are a startup entrepreneur that has raised investment. Seems like the threshold is $250k and it can support up to 3 founders. You must own at least 10% to be considered a founder. Looks like you can also get an additional 30 months by raising a further $500k, or having at least $500k ARR with 20% annual growth, or employing 5 US persons…

One thing that will let you in is if you are invested in from

> investors with established records of successful investments

The rich get richer. Established investors get cheap labor, while upstart competitive investors get buried behind an artificial government wall. I wonder if any established investment firms lobbied for that?

Re: International Entrepreneur Rule

#27

When was this passed?

it is a regulatory action, so it was never "passed" per se. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rulemaking it is post-dated next tuesday, I didn't know could post-date a rule

Because it isn't legally "published" until the next business day and Monday is a federal holiday.

Federal law says rulemaking isn't valid until 180 days have passed so it kicks in July 17.

All of these rules are to keep federal agencies from changing the rules out from under people, and to give Congress/Courts time to act.

Re: International Entrepreneur Rule

#29
post #2

Reading through it. The gist is you can get 30 months of parole from USCIS if you are a startup entrepreneur that has raised investment. Seems like the threshold is $250k and it can support up to 3 founders. You must own at least 10% to be considered a founder. Looks like you can also get an additional 30 months by raising a further $500k, or having at least $500k ARR with 20% annual growth, or employing 5 US persons…

The threshold feels low, especially when compared the the new H1B threshold at 100K. As mentioned earlier, this could be easily gamed.

It's explicitly designed for people who get into YC: you get 2.5 years to prove your startup can make it to the next stage, the 2.5 more years to turn it into a real business (after which there are far more options like K-1, O-1, and various E investor visas). Depending on the situation it might be a formality... if your startup has grown to medium size with 100 employees and $20m revenue my guess is DHS will find any excuse to give you general public-benefit parole or an O-1.

You are also free to apply for other visas while in the US without affecting your parole.

Re: International Entrepreneur Rule

#30
post #2

Reading through it. The gist is you can get 30 months of parole from USCIS if you are a startup entrepreneur that has raised investment. Seems like the threshold is $250k and it can support up to 3 founders. You must own at least 10% to be considered a founder. Looks like you can also get an additional 30 months by raising a further $500k, or having at least $500k ARR with 20% annual growth, or employing 5 US persons…

The threshold feels low, especially when compared the the new H1B threshold at 100K. As mentioned earlier, this could be easily gamed.

I know right!

Company "invests" 250k into a "startup" who's only job is to "consult" with the parent investor company.

BAM! You've just hired 3 engineers right there, who have completely skipped the greencard line.

Post reply on HN