Live data from Hacker News

WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages

theguardian.com

31–40 of 334 posts

Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages

#31
From the outset I've always expected that a backdoor was present in Whatsapp. In fact, I'd be surprised if they hadn't granted themselves some special capabilities with regards to the content of the communications. Touting their end-to-end encryption has enticed many people to trust the product, sometimes with strong conviction, while giving themselves a monopoly on access to communication perceived as secure by the end users. It stands to reason that claims about security and privacy of an end product (the Whatsapp app), no matter how lofty the goals that its creator (especially a murky company like Facebook) has purportedly set out to realize, can be verified without being completely open. There is software out there like OpenSSL that is developed by PhD's, and is completely open and available to anyone who wishes to validate its security, yet vulnerabilities are found years after they've been introduced into the code. Claims to Whatsapp's security/privacy are preposterous a priori.

Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages

#32
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Signal is bad as explained previously, it requires Google on your phone to even work. If you think Google is more trustworthy than Facebook, sure go ahead and just use Hangouts or whatever. We cant have nice good encryption and safe communication when geeks push this Signal onto unsuspecting users, when the real option is to keep improving Tox.Chat and bitmessage.

"Signal is bad as explained previously, it requires Google on your phone to even work. If you think Google is more trustworthy than Facebook, sure go ahead and just use Hangouts or whatever." Every time Signal comes up on HN people make this point (Signal is bad) as if it is true. And every time it is exposed as bs.

A legitimate criticism is that they make it hard for people who don't want to use play services to user their app. For the privacy of the messages themselves, google really cannot interfere, unlike WhatsApp/Facebook.

Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages

#33
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A big reason I dont trust signal. Every single that app has some bad side, signals is the reliance on Google.

Using Signal on iOS here - what is the reliance on Google?

Nothing since you don't have Google Cloud Messaging on iOS, but it's a different situation. IOS is not open source software like Android (AOSP) is. If you want, you can have all the software on your phone be open source (save perhaps for drivers), even though most people will opt to install at least the Google Play Store, which requires you to install the whole google suite (or at least it used to when I flashed Cyanogenmod).

So anyone wanting to have a phone with open source products on it for security reasons, they totally can on Android, but it's impossible with iPhones. Signal probably relies on Apple's variant of Google Cloud Messaging, but since you'll always have that on your phone anyway, it makes no difference.

Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages

#34

From the outset I've always expected that a backdoor was present in Whatsapp. In fact, I'd be surprised if they hadn't granted themselves some special capabilities with regards to the content of the communications. Touting their end-to-end encryption has enticed many people to trust the product, sometimes with strong conviction, while giving themselves a monopoly on access to communication perceived as secure by the…

The fact that you have a PhD in cryptography doesn't necessarily mean you know how to write secure code. Especially C code. Lot of people hated OpenSSL quality long before Heartbleed, but it took that vuln for people to actually realize how bad it is. I can imagine a good, secure SSL library being written by somebody without a PhD, in a safer language.

Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages

#35
I am flagging this article, as the headline and first few paragraphs are very misleading, based on my understanding from: https://tobi.rocks/2016/04/whats-app-retransmission-vulnerab...

They make it sound like an intentional backdoor has been introduced to WhatsApp to facilitate monitoring.

Rather, it seems like there's a weakness in the implementation, where if a message is undelivered, an attacker could trick the sender's client into sending the undelivered message to a new key they control.

That does seem like a weakness, but not an intentional backdoor as the article initially lead me to believe. I could see how someone would trade off ease of use and message delivery with security and make that call.

Yes, it could be a subtle backdoor (with limited exploitation), and yes, open source clients would be great. But real end users use WhatsApp to encrypt their private messages on a scale never before achieved, because of the usability tradeoffs they've made. I think we should bear that in mind before describing any implementation tradeoff as a 'backdoor'.

Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages

#38

Well, if anyone is surprised by this... you really should'nt have been. I still use it. Lock in effect. But I never would have trusted their encryption nearly enough to send anything sensitive.

If only sensitive stuff is encrypted, encryption becomes suspicious.

Add "you don't have something to hide, right?" to using encryption for sensitive stuff and you got a 1984 sequel where encryption is banned or must contain backdoors.

Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages

#39
post #22
post #12

No matter what IM service you use: As long as they manage the public keys for their users, they will be vulnerable to exactly this problem. This isn't just WhatsApp. This applies to iMessage and Signal too. In all cases, we rely on the word of the service provider that they don't sneak additional public keys to encrypt for into the clients and in all cases we hear that doing so would cause a message dialog to appear,…

'As such I think it's unfair to just complain about WhatsApp here.' I disagree. WhatsApp have a known vulnerability which they won't fix (indeed they deliberately added this vuln on top of the Signal protocol), and no denial that they have used this vulnerability in the past. They made a big PR song and dance about this feature only to backdoor it. That deserves criticism.

> I disagree. WhatsApp have a known vulnerability which they won't fix (indeed they deliberately added this vuln on top of the Signal protocol)

how would you fix it without causing notification-blindness?

Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages

#40
post #35

I am flagging this article, as the headline and first few paragraphs are very misleading, based on my understanding from: https://tobi.rocks/2016/04/whats-app-retransmission-vulnerab... They make it sound like an intentional backdoor has been introduced to WhatsApp to facilitate monitoring. Rather, it seems like there's a weakness in the implementation, where if a message is undelivered, an attacker could trick the s…

> They make it sound like an intentional backdoor has been introduced to WhatsApp to facilitate monitoring. Rather, it seems like there's a weakness in the implementation

If I wanted to install an intentional backdoor, I would do my best to make it look like merely a weakness in the implementation.

Post reply on HN