WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages
21–30 of 334 posts
Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages
#22No matter what IM service you use: As long as they manage the public keys for their users, they will be vulnerable to exactly this problem. This isn't just WhatsApp. This applies to iMessage and Signal too. In all cases, we rely on the word of the service provider that they don't sneak additional public keys to encrypt for into the clients and in all cases we hear that doing so would cause a message dialog to appear,…
I disagree. WhatsApp have a known vulnerability which they won't fix (indeed they deliberately added this vuln on top of the Signal protocol), and no denial that they have used this vulnerability in the past.
They made a big PR song and dance about this feature only to backdoor it. That deserves criticism.
Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Signal is bad as explained previously, it requires Google on your phone to even work. If you think Google is more trustworthy than Facebook, sure go ahead and just use Hangouts or whatever. We cant have nice good encryption and safe communication when geeks push this Signal onto unsuspecting users, when the real option is to keep improving Tox.Chat and bitmessage.
> Signal is bad as explained previously, it requires Google on your phone to even work. only for notification delivery. The message payload is not part of the push notification.
Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is the case with Signal as well, and this "security" feature of "google play services" is why the developer of Sigal does not want Signal to be in f-droid.org's repositories. He wants to be able to push "updates" for any future "vulnerability" onto the users of Signal.
A big reason I dont trust signal. Every single that app has some bad side, signals is the reliance on Google.
Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages
#25This was presented in the lightning talks at 33c3, starting around minute 48: https://media.ccc.de/v/33c3-8089-lightning_talks_day_4
Here's the congress wiki with some more links: https://events.ccc.de/congress/2016/wiki/Lightning:A_Backdoo...
And a blogpost: https://tobi.rocks/2016/04/whats-app-retransmission-vulnerab...
Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages
#26Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages
#27Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages
#28The key part is this, and it was apparently reported back in April 2016 with Facebook replying it's "expected behavior", it's not something a general attacker can do but it would enable WhatsApp/Facebook to read conversations: > WhatsApp has the ability to force the generation of new encryption keys for offline users, unbeknown to the sender and recipient of the messages, and to make the sender re-encrypt messages wi…
And any WhatsApp update could potentially include code to snoop on decrypted messages so exploits that can only be performed from the WhatsApp server side - i.e the example in the article about snooping entire conversations - are not really that relevant.
Having said that, it's disappointing and they should adopt Signal's approach.
Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages
#29Re: WhatsApp backdoor allows snooping on encrypted messages
#30No matter what IM service you use: As long as they manage the public keys for their users, they will be vulnerable to exactly this problem. This isn't just WhatsApp. This applies to iMessage and Signal too. In all cases, we rely on the word of the service provider that they don't sneak additional public keys to encrypt for into the clients and in all cases we hear that doing so would cause a message dialog to appear,…
'As such I think it's unfair to just complain about WhatsApp here.' I disagree. WhatsApp have a known vulnerability which they won't fix (indeed they deliberately added this vuln on top of the Signal protocol), and no denial that they have used this vulnerability in the past. They made a big PR song and dance about this feature only to backdoor it. That deserves criticism.