Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry, I don't understand your question.
How can you know for sure?
Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0
131–140 of 201 posts
Re: Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0
#132Native all the way! Opening github page of app and seeing that pink line instead of yellow (line that represents languages used in project) made me smile! I am really surprised they did native app, plus it looks really nice, I tought "sigh, another electron app", but to my surprise I was wrong! Good job for guys at Telegram, respect.
No secret chats in Telegram Desktop means its primary selling point is lost.
[1]: https://wire.com
Re: Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0
#133Re: Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0
#134A brilliant native desktop app is one of the reasons why I prefer telegram over other apps of this kind. It's smooth, light and easy to use.
Also, unlike WhatsApp web, it's not a proxy for the phone app, thus doesn't drain its battery and still works if your phone is broken or lost.
Re: Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0
#135Re: Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0
#136It's so stupid that I can't read public channels without providing a valid phone number. I don't need any secrecy, just want to read damn blog posts!
Hm, this gets me thinking... it wouldn't take much work to get a public channel viewer website working.
Re: Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0
#137PSA: Telegram is dangerous snake oil—bad crypto. Don't use it, don't let friends use it. https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/81899003583181619... https://twitter.com/kaepora/status/819181464369577984 https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/81919238137120358...
I was just about to post something similar. I'm actually surprised to see a positive post of Telegram on HN. For the love of crypto, please stick to Signal protocol-based messaging applications. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_Protocol Edit: add link http://www.cryptofails.com/post/70546720222/telegrams-crypta...
The problem is that most people value convenience and speed over security and privacy. Telegram provides a very good trade off, much better than some other apps. If Signal were to be developed at the pace Telegram is, I would use it all the time, but it's not. For my use and likes, both Telegram and Wire are very good fits.
Re: Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0
#138Native all the way! Opening github page of app and seeing that pink line instead of yellow (line that represents languages used in project) made me smile! I am really surprised they did native app, plus it looks really nice, I tought "sigh, another electron app", but to my surprise I was wrong! Good job for guys at Telegram, respect.
No secret chats in Telegram Desktop means its primary selling point is lost.
Secret chats on OSX has the same UX as secret chats on my Android client, fwiw.
Re: Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0
#139I love Telegram for the usability more than anything else, and don't really care for the encryption (which I find more of a curiosity). Telegram hits a few sweet spots with me: - Movement between devices is seamless (I can go from my webview in BSD to my Mac OS Native to my iOS native app and not miss a beat). - Telegram is very reliable in situations with poor connectivity. This is pure anecdote on my side, but in t…
Re: Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also, unlike WhatsApp web, it's not a proxy for the phone app, thus doesn't drain its battery and still works if your phone is broken or lost.
i like the whatsapp web because i dont have to install something now just so i could send a message to somebody, and because its a proxy for the phone app i dont have to worry that i got the message on the desktop but its not synced to mobile ( im looking at you skype )
Really terrible and frustrating UX for me. I loathe that web interface.