Earlier quoted context omitted.
>I truly wonder if those companies would opt to just leave their staff in India, and to hire mostly just customer-facing support types here otherwise. It's already much cheaper to employ someone in India than to pay that person in the US. The only reason they are using H-1B employees based in the US, is that some companies that are contracting Infosys and Tata want US based employees.
"It's already much cheaper to employ someone in India than to pay that person in the US." Agreed, but there might be advantages to having someone in the US. Given a 'major change' it's not entirely unfeasible that these companies do a re-structuring, i.e. using a different customer engagement model (1 customer-facing American + more staff in India) and leverage more 'remote' style technology. Also - remember that the…
My argument is that they are essentially already hiring the minimum number of US based employees that they can get away with. There are companies contracting them that want a minimum number of butts in seats on premises.