Ask HN: What “old” programming languages will you still be using in 2017?
391–400 of 502 posts
Re: Ask HN: What “old” programming languages will you still be using in 2017?
#392Re: Ask HN: What “old” programming languages will you still be using in 2017?
#393- sh (I really don't use bash features in scripting) - awk - perl - sed, if that counts as language. It's funny that a course that I took in university almost 29 years ago, for learning the use of Unix scripting tools, is one of the most useful learning experiences in my daily work today - even if my job is not really a programmer. But very often I see colleagues (project managers, architects etc) struggle with proce…
It should be an absolute clusterfuck but it's been surprisingly reliable and performant, to the point where I have no desire to replace it.
Re: Ask HN: What “old” programming languages will you still be using in 2017?
#394Taking a deep look into Lazarus/FreePascal/Object Pascal this year (because I can still code Pascal & VCL code in sleep nowadays). Want to see if it's good enough to develop a simple macOS, Linux and Windows application at the same time.
Why FreePascal over Qt for cross platform gui applications? I had a contract doing C++/qt stuff 2015/2016. So I could conjure up my own reasons for and against. But I am curious about yours as I am largely ignorant of pascal.
Re: Ask HN: What “old” programming languages will you still be using in 2017?
#395Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does it indicate over-supply? Maybe, but it's probably a bit more complicated than that. There is a very large supply of self-proclaimed Python programmers. (There's no official accreditation of this, of course, so we can only go by self-proclamation.) But this is unlike, say, raw materials supply for building a bridge. A lot---and by "a lot", I mean enough to be noticed when hiring---of the "Python programmer supply…
>As for software jobs in the domain of math/physics/etc., they're out there, but just harder to seek out. I'm well aware of that. However, my experience is the working conditions are poor. Some do have a higher salary, but everything else seemed worse. Also, not entirely related, but it does suck more when you're working on a very challenging problem, and can't fully crack it on the company's desired schedule. You ge…
Re: Ask HN: What “old” programming languages will you still be using in 2017?
#396Re: Ask HN: What “old” programming languages will you still be using in 2017?
#397Re: Ask HN: What “old” programming languages will you still be using in 2017?
#398Many folks have said it here but I'll say it again: Common Lisp. I have been using it professionally for 5+ years as a full-time employee at various companies. Some big-name ones, some smaller start-up ones. The mean Lisp team size has been around 4, but I did work on a project of 15 Lisp programmers. None of these projects were legacy code. Some were in places you wouldn't expect (embedded, multi-processor systems o…
Re: Ask HN: What “old” programming languages will you still be using in 2017?
#399Re: Ask HN: What “old” programming languages will you still be using in 2017?
#400Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seems only two of us here.
Perhaps the only two who still enjoy it. :) I'm working on the latest revision of a client's CF intranet app that been in use for fifteen years, now.